PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GINN vs. MVPS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and MVPS is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

GINN vs. MVPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF (MVPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-5.19%
-7.81%
GINN
MVPS

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


GINN

YTD

-8.54%

1M

-7.00%

6M

-6.81%

1Y

7.31%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MVPS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GINN vs. MVPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MVPS's 0.49% expense ratio.


GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for GINN: current value is 0.50%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
GINN: 0.50%
Expense ratio chart for MVPS: current value is 0.49%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
MVPS: 0.49%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GINN vs. MVPS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GINN is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GINN is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GINN is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GINN is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GINN is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GINN is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

MVPS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MVPS is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MVPS is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MVPS is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MVPS is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MVPS is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MVPS is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GINN vs. MVPS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF (MVPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GINN, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
GINN: 0.27
MVPS: 0.62
The chart of Sortino ratio for GINN, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
GINN: 0.53
MVPS: 0.96
The chart of Omega ratio for GINN, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
GINN: 1.07
MVPS: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for GINN, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
GINN: 0.26
MVPS: 0.39
The chart of Martin ratio for GINN, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
GINN: 1.18
MVPS: 2.33


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.27
0.62
GINN
MVPS

Dividends

GINN vs. MVPS - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while MVPS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.38%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%
MVPS
Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GINN vs. MVPS - Drawdown Comparison


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-15.06%
-19.78%
GINN
MVPS

Volatility

GINN vs. MVPS - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) has a higher volatility of 13.97% compared to Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF (MVPS) at 0.00%. This indicates that GINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
13.97%
0
GINN
MVPS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab