PortfoliosLab logo
GILD vs. PEP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GILD and PEP is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GILD vs. PEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GILD:

2.10

PEP:

-1.31

Sortino Ratio

GILD:

3.28

PEP:

-1.70

Omega Ratio

GILD:

1.42

PEP:

0.80

Calmar Ratio

GILD:

2.12

PEP:

-0.83

Martin Ratio

GILD:

11.94

PEP:

-1.92

Ulcer Index

GILD:

5.27%

PEP:

12.69%

Daily Std Dev

GILD:

26.90%

PEP:

19.65%

Max Drawdown

GILD:

-70.82%

PEP:

-40.41%

Current Drawdown

GILD:

-13.00%

PEP:

-29.30%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GILD:

$129.26B

PEP:

$180.54B

EPS

GILD:

$4.76

PEP:

$6.80

PE Ratio

GILD:

21.81

PEP:

19.36

PEG Ratio

GILD:

0.20

PEP:

2.32

PS Ratio

GILD:

4.50

PEP:

1.97

PB Ratio

GILD:

6.30

PEP:

9.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

GILD:

$28.73B

PEP:

$91.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GILD:

$23.07B

PEP:

$50.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

GILD:

$9.89B

PEP:

$16.57B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILD achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than PEP's -13.54% return. Over the past 10 years, GILD has underperformed PEP with an annualized return of 2.73%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively higher 5.95% annualized return.


GILD

YTD

10.58%

1M

-2.12%

6M

9.17%

1Y

55.82%

5Y*

10.00%

10Y*

2.73%

PEP

YTD

-13.54%

1M

-9.78%

6M

-19.32%

1Y

-25.56%

5Y*

2.54%

10Y*

5.95%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GILD vs. PEP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GILD is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GILD is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GILD is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GILD is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GILD is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GILD is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PEP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PEP is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PEP is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PEP is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PEP is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PEP is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PEP is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GILD vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GILD Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the PEP Sharpe Ratio of -1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILD and PEP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GILD vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison

GILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than PEP's 4.17% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
3.06%3.33%3.70%3.40%3.91%4.67%3.88%3.65%2.90%2.57%1.27%0.00%
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
4.17%3.52%2.92%2.51%2.45%2.71%2.77%3.25%2.64%2.83%2.76%2.68%

Drawdowns

GILD vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILD drawdown since its inception was -70.82%, which is greater than PEP's maximum drawdown of -40.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILD and PEP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GILD vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison

Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) has a higher volatility of 11.58% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 7.38%. This indicates that GILD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GILD vs. PEP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
6.67B
17.92B
(GILD) Total Revenue
(PEP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GILD vs. PEP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20212022202320242025
85.6%
55.8%
(GILD) Gross Margin
(PEP) Gross Margin
GILD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.71B and revenue of 6.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.6%.

PEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 9.99B and revenue of 17.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.8%.

GILD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.15B and revenue of 6.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.2%.

PEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.58B and revenue of 17.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

GILD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 6.67B, resulting in a net margin of 19.7%.

PEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 17.92B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.