PortfoliosLab logo
GIII vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GIII and COST is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GIII vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GIII:

-0.02

COST:

1.29

Sortino Ratio

GIII:

0.28

COST:

1.81

Omega Ratio

GIII:

1.04

COST:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

GIII:

-0.03

COST:

1.65

Martin Ratio

GIII:

-0.12

COST:

4.74

Ulcer Index

GIII:

17.71%

COST:

6.04%

Daily Std Dev

GIII:

46.97%

COST:

22.13%

Max Drawdown

GIII:

-93.83%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

GIII:

-60.15%

COST:

-3.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GIII:

$1.24B

COST:

$449.51B

EPS

GIII:

$4.17

COST:

$17.05

PE Ratio

GIII:

6.82

COST:

59.16

PEG Ratio

GIII:

0.98

COST:

5.36

PS Ratio

GIII:

0.39

COST:

1.70

PB Ratio

GIII:

0.74

COST:

17.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

GIII:

$2.55B

COST:

$264.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GIII:

$1.02B

COST:

$35.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

GIII:

$294.10M

COST:

$11.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIII achieves a -10.94% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 13.80% return. Over the past 10 years, GIII has underperformed COST with an annualized return of -7.01%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 24.24% annualized return.


GIII

YTD

-10.94%

1M

15.19%

6M

-1.96%

1Y

-1.02%

3Y*

5.05%

5Y*

22.97%

10Y*

-7.01%

COST

YTD

13.80%

1M

4.73%

6M

7.29%

1Y

28.24%

3Y*

32.50%

5Y*

29.64%

10Y*

24.24%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.

Costco Wholesale Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GIII vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIII
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIII is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIII is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIII is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIII is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIII is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIII is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GIII vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GIII Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIII and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GIII vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

GIII has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GIII
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.46%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

GIII vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIII drawdown since its inception was -93.83%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIII and COST.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GIII vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII) has a higher volatility of 9.15% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.12%. This indicates that GIII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GIII vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
839.54M
63.72B
(GIII) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GIII vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
39.5%
15.1%
(GIII) Gross Margin
(COST) Gross Margin
GIII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. reported a gross profit of 331.63M and revenue of 839.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.5%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.61B and revenue of 63.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

GIII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. reported an operating income of 71.77M and revenue of 839.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

GIII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. reported a net income of 48.78M and revenue of 839.54M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.