GIAX vs. KLIP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP).

GIAX and KLIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GIAX is an actively managed fund by Nicholas. It was launched on Jul 29, 2024. KLIP is managed by CICC. It was launched on Jan 12, 2023.

Performance

GIAX vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GIAX vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF	-8.92%	11.73%	3.74%
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	-8.98%	16.92%	4.63%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GIAX having a -8.92% return and KLIP slightly lower at -8.98%.

GIAX

• 1D: 5.62%
• 1M: -7.07%
• YTD: -8.92%
• 6M: -9.08%
• 1Y: 9.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KLIP

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: -5.77%
• YTD: -8.98%
• 6M: -12.63%
• 1Y: -1.25%
• 3Y*: 7.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIAX vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.

GIAX

Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF

KLIP

KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

GIAX vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIAX

GIAX Risk / Return Rank: 26
GIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
GIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
GIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
GIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

KLIP

KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 11
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 11
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIAX vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GIAX	KLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	-0.06	+0.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	0.05	+0.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.01	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	-0.08	+0.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.18	-0.26	+2.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GIAX vs. KLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is higher than the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIAX and KLIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GIAX	KLIP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39	-0.06	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.35	-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between GIAX and KLIP is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GIAX vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

GIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.86%, more than KLIP's 28.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF	28.86%	25.62%	10.58%	0.00%
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	28.24%	25.14%	54.26%	61.22%

Drawdowns

GIAX vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIAX and KLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIAX	KLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.38%	-18.61%	-1.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.62%	-17.23%	-0.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.99%	-14.21%	+1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.05%	-3.34%	+0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.97%	5.18%	-1.21%

Volatility

GIAX vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) has a higher volatility of 12.23% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 7.16%. This indicates that GIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIAX	KLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.23%	7.16%	+5.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.18%	13.48%	+4.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.87%	19.76%	+4.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.93%	18.19%	+2.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.93%	18.19%	+2.74%