PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIAX vs. KLIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIAX vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIAX achieves a 16.24% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -16.70% return.


GIAX

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
16.24%
6M
13.93%
1Y
22.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KLIP

1D
-2.12%
1M
-9.60%
YTD
-16.70%
6M
-18.31%
1Y
-11.82%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIAX vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GIAX and KLIP is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2024

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIAX vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIAX
GIAX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

KLIP
KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIAX vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GIAXKLIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.88

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

-0.55

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.17

-1.52

+6.69

GIAX vs. KLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIAX and KLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIAX vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum KLIP drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIAX and KLIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIAXKLIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.38%

-21.48%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

-21.48%

+3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.56%

-21.48%

+13.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-4.00%

+0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

7.80%

-3.45%

Volatility

GIAX vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) has a higher volatility of 10.26% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 5.61%. This indicates that GIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIAXKLIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.26%

5.61%

+4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.97%

13.23%

+7.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.31%

16.27%

+7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.05%

18.14%

+3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.05%

18.14%

+3.91%

GIAX vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIAX vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

GIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.22%, less than KLIP's 31.13% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GIAX
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF
25.22%25.62%10.58%0.00%
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
31.13%25.14%54.26%61.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIAX and KLIP have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIAX has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to KLIP (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIAX dropped -20.38% vs KLIP's -21.48%.

On 1-year performance, GIAX leads with 22.47% vs -11.82% for KLIP. On fees, KLIP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, KLIP has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GIAX has performed better with a 22.47% return vs -11.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KLIP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for GIAX.

KLIP has the higher dividend yield at 31.13%, compared with 25.22% for GIAX.

GIAX is categorized as Derivative Income, while KLIP is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for GIAX and 0.95% for KLIP.

GIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIAX and KLIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer