GIAX vs. KLIP
GIAX (Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF) and KLIP (KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GIAX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nicholas, while KLIP is a Options Trading fund managed by CICC. Over the past year, GIAX returned 22.47% vs -11.82% for KLIP. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIAX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KLIP.
Performance
GIAX vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIAX achieves a 16.24% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -16.70% return.
GIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 16.24%
- 6M
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KLIP
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -9.60%
- YTD
- -16.70%
- 6M
- -18.31%
- 1Y
- -11.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIAX vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 16.24% | 11.73% | 2.94% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | -16.70% | 16.92% | 3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIAX and KLIP is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2024 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIAX vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank
GIAX
KLIP
GIAX vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIAX | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.88 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | -0.55 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | -1.52 | +6.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIAX vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum KLIP drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIAX and KLIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIAX | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -21.48% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -21.48% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.56% | -21.48% | +13.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -4.00% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 7.80% | -3.45% |
Volatility
GIAX vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) has a higher volatility of 10.26% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 5.61%. This indicates that GIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIAX | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.26% | 5.61% | +4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.97% | 13.23% | +7.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.31% | 16.27% | +7.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.05% | 18.14% | +3.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.05% | 18.14% | +3.91% |
GIAX vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIAX vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison
GIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.22%, less than KLIP's 31.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 25.22% | 25.62% | 10.58% | 0.00% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | 31.13% | 25.14% | 54.26% | 61.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIAX and KLIP have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIAX has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to KLIP (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIAX dropped -20.38% vs KLIP's -21.48%.
On 1-year performance, GIAX leads with 22.47% vs -11.82% for KLIP. On fees, KLIP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, KLIP has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GIAX has performed better with a 22.47% return vs -11.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KLIP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for GIAX.
KLIP has the higher dividend yield at 31.13%, compared with 25.22% for GIAX.
GIAX is categorized as Derivative Income, while KLIP is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for GIAX and 0.95% for KLIP.
GIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIAX and KLIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer