PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
GHEE vs. GABF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GHEE and GABF is -0.11. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

GHEE vs. GABF

Last updated Jun 1, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Goose Hollow Enhanced Equity ETF (GHEE) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF).

GHEE and GABF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GHEE is an actively managed fund by Goose Hollow. It was launched on Nov 17, 2023. GABF is an actively managed fund by Gabelli. It was launched on May 9, 2022.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GHEE or GABF.

Performance

GHEE vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goose Hollow Enhanced Equity ETF (GHEE) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period

GHEE

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GABF

YTD

-0.67%

1M

5.33%

6M

-6.60%

1Y

23.94%

3Y*

23.00%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Goose Hollow Enhanced Equity ETF

Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF

GHEE vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHEE has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.

GHEE
Goose Hollow Enhanced Equity ETF
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GHEE vs. GABF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GHEE
GABF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GABF is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GABF is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GABF is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GABF is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GABF is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GABF is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GHEE vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goose Hollow Enhanced Equity ETF (GHEE) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GHEE vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

GHEE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%.

TTM202420232022
GHEE
Goose Hollow Enhanced Equity ETF		0.00%0.00%1.13%0.00%
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF		4.22%4.19%4.95%1.31%

Drawdowns

GHEE vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GHEE vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...