PortfoliosLab logo
GFS vs. AMZN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GFS and AMZN is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

GFS vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-21.55%
10.24%
GFS
AMZN

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GFS:

-0.50

AMZN:

0.26

Sortino Ratio

GFS:

-0.50

AMZN:

0.59

Omega Ratio

GFS:

0.94

AMZN:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

GFS:

-0.42

AMZN:

0.28

Martin Ratio

GFS:

-0.94

AMZN:

0.77

Ulcer Index

GFS:

27.13%

AMZN:

11.12%

Daily Std Dev

GFS:

51.36%

AMZN:

33.54%

Max Drawdown

GFS:

-61.53%

AMZN:

-94.40%

Current Drawdown

GFS:

-53.89%

AMZN:

-21.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GFS:

$20.13B

AMZN:

$2.02T

EPS

GFS:

-$0.48

AMZN:

$6.14

PEG Ratio

GFS:

0.86

AMZN:

1.43

PS Ratio

GFS:

2.98

AMZN:

3.10

PB Ratio

GFS:

1.87

AMZN:

6.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

GFS:

$5.20B

AMZN:

$650.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GFS:

$1.26B

AMZN:

$295.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

GFS:

$842.00M

AMZN:

$115.84B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFS achieves a -15.17% return, which is significantly lower than AMZN's -13.41% return.


GFS

YTD

-15.17%

1M

15.41%

6M

-0.63%

1Y

-26.12%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AMZN

YTD

-13.41%

1M

11.10%

6M

-4.02%

1Y

2.02%

5Y*

10.43%

10Y*

24.52%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GFS vs. AMZN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GFS is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GFS is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GFS is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GFS is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GFS is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GFS is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMZN is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMZN is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMZN is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMZN is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMZN is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMZN is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GFS vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GFS, currently valued at -0.50, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
GFS: -0.50
AMZN: 0.26
The chart of Sortino ratio for GFS, currently valued at -0.50, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
GFS: -0.50
AMZN: 0.59
The chart of Omega ratio for GFS, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
GFS: 0.94
AMZN: 1.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for GFS, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
GFS: -0.42
AMZN: 0.28
The chart of Martin ratio for GFS, currently valued at -0.94, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
GFS: -0.94
AMZN: 0.77

The current GFS Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the AMZN Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFS and AMZN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.50
0.26
GFS
AMZN

Dividends

GFS vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison

Neither GFS nor AMZN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GFS vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFS drawdown since its inception was -61.53%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFS and AMZN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-53.89%
-21.52%
GFS
AMZN

Volatility

GFS vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) has a higher volatility of 25.71% compared to Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) at 19.37%. This indicates that GFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
25.71%
19.37%
GFS
AMZN

Financials

GFS vs. AMZN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20212022202320242025
1.83B
155.67B
(GFS) Total Revenue
(AMZN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GFS vs. AMZN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
24.5%
34.8%
(GFS) Gross Margin
(AMZN) Gross Margin
GFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 449.00M and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.
AMZN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amazon.com, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.10B and revenue of 155.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
GFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of -701.00M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of -38.3%.
AMZN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amazon.com, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.41B and revenue of 155.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
GFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of -730.00M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of -39.9%.
AMZN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amazon.com, Inc. reported a net income of 17.13B and revenue of 155.67B, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.