GFS vs. AMZN
GFS (GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.) and AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) are both stocks. GFS operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while AMZN operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, GFS returned -5.19%/yr vs 26.72%/yr for AMZN. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GFS vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFS achieves a 43.42% return, which is significantly higher than AMZN's 23.05% return.
GFS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -28.39%
- 6M
- 18.73%
- YTD
- 43.42%
- 1Y
- 36.91%
- 3Y*
- -5.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.34%
AMZN
- 1D
- 4.58%
- 1M
- 17.04%
- 6M
- 16.90%
- YTD
- 23.05%
- 1Y
- 32.26%
- 3Y*
- 26.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- 22.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 30.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | $14.75B | $11.88B | $12.52B |
| $220.58M | $214.32M | $340.43M |
GFS vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 43.42% | -18.62% | -29.19% | 12.45% | -17.05% | 38.23% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 23.05% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | -1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFS and AMZN is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.42 |
The correlation between GFS and AMZN shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GFS:
$27.44B
AMZN:
$3.06T
GFS:
$1.39
AMZN:
$12.44
GFS:
36.02
AMZN:
22.82
GFS:
4.10
AMZN:
3.98
GFS:
2.40
AMZN:
5.61
GFS:
$6.84B
AMZN:
$775.68B
GFS:
$1.81B
AMZN:
$393.81B
GFS:
$2.16B
AMZN:
$254.00B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFS vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank
GFS
AMZN
GFS vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFS | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 1.49 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 3.18 | -0.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFS vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFS drawdown since its inception was -61.53%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFS and AMZN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFS | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.53% | -94.40% | +32.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.60% | -21.74% | -25.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.21% | -30.88% | -20.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.33% | 0.00% | -44.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.22% | -28.11% | -6.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.94% | 10.17% | +2.77% |
Volatility
GFS vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) have volatilities of 16.86% and 16.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFS | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.86% | 16.97% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.30% | 26.83% | +22.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.73% | 34.50% | +24.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.82% | 36.34% | +15.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.82% | 33.04% | +18.78% |
Dividends
GFS vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison
GFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% |
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 0.24% |
Financials
GFS vs. AMZN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GFS vs. AMZN - Profitability Comparison
GFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.00M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
AMZN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 104.83B and revenue of 200.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.
GFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.
AMZN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 27.46B and revenue of 200.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.
GFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.
AMZN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 62.65B and revenue of 200.61B, resulting in a net margin of 31.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFS and AMZN have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZN has higher volatility (16.97%) compared to GFS (16.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFS dropped -61.53% vs AMZN's -94.40%.
AMZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFS and AMZN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer