PortfoliosLab logo
GFI vs. IAUF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GFI and IAUF is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GFI vs. IAUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and iShares Gold Strategy ETF (IAUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


GFI

YTD

69.75%

1M

-8.34%

6M

49.48%

1Y

35.00%

3Y*

28.69%

5Y*

25.89%

10Y*

23.11%

IAUF

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Gold Fields Limited

iShares Gold Strategy ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GFI vs. IAUF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GFI is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GFI is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GFI is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GFI is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GFI is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GFI is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IAUF is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IAUF is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IAUF is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IAUF is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IAUF is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IAUF is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GFI vs. IAUF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and iShares Gold Strategy ETF (IAUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

GFI vs. IAUF - Dividend Comparison

GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while IAUF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
2.47%2.94%2.86%3.40%3.24%1.73%0.80%1.62%1.77%1.69%0.72%0.86%
IAUF
iShares Gold Strategy ETF
100.19%100.19%13.18%0.88%0.00%7.61%10.04%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GFI vs. IAUF - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

GFI vs. IAUF - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...