GFI vs. AUMN

In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -3.06% return, which is significantly higher than AUMN's -83.27% return. Over the past 10 years, GFI has outperformed AUMN with an annualized return of 14.55%, while AUMN has yielded a comparatively lower -38.14% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Golden Minerals Company (AUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GFI Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is higher than the AUMN Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFI and AUMN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, while AUMN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -86.06%, smaller than the maximum AUMN drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and AUMN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) is 9.02%, while Golden Minerals Company (AUMN) has a volatility of 41.38%. This indicates that GFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Golden Minerals Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.