GFI vs. AUMN
Compare and contrast key facts about Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Golden Minerals Company (AUMN).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GFI or AUMN.
Key characteristics
| GFI | AUMN | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.85% | -40.39% |
| 1Y Return | 7.08% | -39.24% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.70% | -70.68% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 24.47% | -43.30% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 15.78% | -32.71% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.26 | -0.35 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.68 | 0.13 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.09 | 1.02 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.46 | -0.36 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.93 | -0.86 |
| Ulcer Index | 13.76% | 42.08% |
| Daily Std Dev | 49.71% | 103.10% |
| Max Drawdown | -86.06% | -99.97% |
| Current Drawdown | -27.66% | -99.96% |
Fundamentals
| GFI | AUMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.55B | $5.01M |
| EPS | $0.71 | -$0.78 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $4.36B | $300.00K |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.11B | -$1.60M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.91B | -$6.35M |
Correlation
The correlation between GFI and AUMN is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GFI vs. AUMN - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -2.85% return, which is significantly higher than AUMN's -40.39% return. Over the past 10 years, GFI has outperformed AUMN with an annualized return of 15.78%, while AUMN has yielded a comparatively lower -32.71% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GFI vs. AUMN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Golden Minerals Company (AUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GFI vs. AUMN - Dividend Comparison
GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, while AUMN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 2.84% | 2.86% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.73% | 0.80% | 1.62% | 1.77% | 1.69% | 0.72% | 0.86% | 2.66% |
AUMN Golden Minerals Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GFI vs. AUMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -86.06%, smaller than the maximum AUMN drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and AUMN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GFI vs. AUMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) is 15.98%, while Golden Minerals Company (AUMN) has a volatility of 32.69%. This indicates that GFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GFI vs. AUMN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Golden Minerals Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities