GFI vs. AUMN
Compare and contrast key facts about Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Golden Minerals Company (AUMN).
Performance
GFI vs. AUMN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GFI vs. AUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 13.45% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
AUMN Golden Minerals Company | -36.45% | 253.13% | -82.03% | -92.42% | -21.44% | -54.04% | 145.16% | 41.62% | -49.09% | -25.87% |
Fundamentals
GFI:
$43.05B
AUMN:
$3.49M
GFI:
$5.39
AUMN:
$0.17
GFI:
8.93
AUMN:
1.23
GFI:
5.10
AUMN:
4.04
GFI:
$13.98B
AUMN:
$0.00
GFI:
$7.34B
AUMN:
$0.00
GFI:
$8.04B
AUMN:
-$3.55M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly higher than AUMN's -36.45% return. Over the past 10 years, GFI has outperformed AUMN with an annualized return of 31.70%, while AUMN has yielded a comparatively lower -32.70% annualized return.
GFI
- 1D
- 6.01%
- 1M
- -14.48%
- YTD
- 13.45%
- 6M
- 18.67%
- 1Y
- 119.94%
- 3Y*
- 58.55%
- 5Y*
- 41.26%
- 10Y*
- 31.70%
AUMN
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -29.39%
- YTD
- -36.45%
- 6M
- -54.76%
- 1Y
- 1.80%
- 3Y*
- -65.43%
- 5Y*
- -58.64%
- 10Y*
- -32.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFI vs. AUMN — Risk / Return Rank
GFI
AUMN
GFI vs. AUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Golden Minerals Company (AUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFI | AUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 0.02 | +1.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | 0.95 | +1.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.11 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 0.01 | +3.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.55 | 0.01 | +11.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFI | AUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 0.02 | +1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | -0.55 | +1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | -0.33 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.25 | +0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between GFI and AUMN is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GFI vs. AUMN - Dividend Comparison
GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while AUMN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 3.83% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
AUMN Golden Minerals Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GFI vs. AUMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, smaller than the maximum AUMN drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and AUMN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFI | AUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.05% | -99.99% | +11.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.63% | -63.93% | +29.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.22% | -99.61% | +43.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.09% | -99.70% | +36.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.47% | -99.97% | +80.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.43% | -86.47% | +42.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.97% | 32.47% | -21.50% |
Volatility
GFI vs. AUMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) is 19.95%, while Golden Minerals Company (AUMN) has a volatility of 22.72%. This indicates that GFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GFI | AUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.95% | 22.72% | -2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.31% | 72.30% | -23.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.00% | 119.83% | -58.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.62% | 107.15% | -55.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.33% | 99.37% | -44.04% |
Financials
GFI vs. AUMN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Golden Minerals Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities