GERN vs. UHS
GERN (Geron Corporation) and UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — GERN in Biotechnology, UHS in Medical Care Facilities. Over the past 10 years, GERN returned -8.86%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for UHS. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GERN vs. UHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GERN achieves a -11.36% return, which is significantly higher than UHS's -34.55% return. Over the past 10 years, GERN has underperformed UHS with an annualized return of -8.86%, while UHS has yielded a comparatively higher 0.94% annualized return.
GERN
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -25.95%
- YTD
- -11.36%
- 6M
- -4.88%
- 1Y
- -18.18%
- 3Y*
- -31.25%
- 5Y*
- -3.53%
- 10Y*
- -8.86%
UHS
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -14.64%
- YTD
- -34.55%
- 6M
- -40.22%
- 1Y
- -23.70%
- 3Y*
- 2.13%
- 5Y*
- -1.66%
- 10Y*
- 0.94%
GERN vs. UHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GERN Geron Corporation | -11.36% | -62.71% | 67.77% | -12.81% | 98.36% | -23.27% | 16.91% | 36.00% | -44.44% | -13.04% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | -34.55% | 22.02% | 18.19% | 8.83% | 9.37% | -5.16% | -4.00% | 23.62% | 3.16% | 6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between GERN and UHS is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 1996 | 0.19 |
The correlation between GERN and UHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GERN:
-$0.10
UHS:
$31.29
GERN:
3.98
UHS:
0.39
GERN:
$196.12M
UHS:
$17.76B
GERN:
$119.67M
UHS:
$12.01B
GERN:
-$40.62M
UHS:
$2.79B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GERN vs. UHS — Risk / Return Rank
GERN
UHS
GERN vs. UHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geron Corporation (GERN) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GERN | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | -0.75 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.00 | -0.89 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.88 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.60 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | -1.56 | +0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GERN | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 | -0.75 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | -0.05 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 | 0.03 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.44 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
GERN vs. UHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GERN drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than UHS's maximum drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERN and UHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GERN | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.73% | -60.27% | -38.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.00% | -41.52% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.98% | -41.52% | -37.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.98% | -44.90% | -34.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.09% | -56.30% | -29.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.32% | -41.52% | -56.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.15% | -14.79% | -71.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.14% | 15.90% | +4.24% |
Volatility
GERN vs. UHS - Volatility Comparison
Geron Corporation (GERN) has a higher volatility of 15.10% compared to Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) at 5.85%. This indicates that GERN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GERN | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.10% | 5.85% | +9.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.90% | 24.95% | +21.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.01% | 31.81% | +32.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.39% | 31.76% | +50.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.09% | 34.36% | +43.73% |
Dividends
GERN vs. UHS - Dividend Comparison
GERN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GERN Geron Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | 0.42% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.33% |
Financials
GERN vs. UHS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Geron Corporation and Universal Health Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GERN vs. UHS - Profitability Comparison
GERN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geron Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 51.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
UHS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GERN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geron Corporation reported an operating income of 158.00K and revenue of 51.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
UHS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 502.86M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
GERN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geron Corporation reported a net income of -3.64M and revenue of 51.84M, resulting in a net margin of -7.0%.
UHS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a net income of 348.68M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GERN and UHS have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GERN has higher volatility (15.10%) compared to UHS (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GERN dropped -98.73% vs UHS's -60.27%.
GERN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GERN and UHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer