PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEO vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GEO vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEO achieves a 45.04% return, which is significantly higher than META's -9.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GEO has underperformed META with an annualized return of 5.09%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.66% annualized return.


GEO

1D
0.17%
1M
24.69%
YTD
45.04%
6M
40.59%
1Y
-13.66%
3Y*
46.02%
5Y*
30.96%
10Y*
5.09%

META

1D
-0.47%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
-9.38%
6M
-7.49%
1Y
-10.64%
3Y*
30.25%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
17.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEO vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GEO
The GEO Group, Inc.
45.04%-42.39%158.36%-1.10%41.29%-9.92%-39.13%-6.80%-9.35%5.08%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-9.38%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GEO and META is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.20

Fundamentals

EPS

GEO:

$1.83

META:

$27.47

PE Ratio

GEO:

12.80

META:

21.76

PEG Ratio

GEO:

0.07

META:

0.90

PS Ratio

GEO:

1.24

META:

7.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

GEO:

$2.63B

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GEO:

$1.59B

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

GEO:

$590.25M

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEO vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEO
GEO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEO vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GEOMETADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.27

-0.31

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.04

-0.21

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.97

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

-0.22

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.44

-0.48

+0.04

GEO vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is comparable to the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEO and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GEOMETADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

-0.31

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.30

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.46

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.55

-0.24

Drawdowns

GEO vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEO drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEO and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEOMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.59%

-76.74%

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.82%

-33.30%

-17.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.49%

-34.15%

-28.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.49%

-76.74%

+14.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.82%

-76.74%

-1.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.86%

-24.17%

-9.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.93%

-15.25%

-23.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.72%

15.41%

+16.31%

Volatility

GEO vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a higher volatility of 21.77% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 7.75%. This indicates that GEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEOMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.77%

7.75%

+14.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.78%

26.26%

+14.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.55%

35.16%

+16.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.55%

43.95%

+11.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.78%

38.63%

+13.15%

Dividends

GEO vs. META - Dividend Comparison

GEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEO
The GEO Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.23%20.09%11.56%9.54%7.95%7.24%8.68%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.35%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GEO vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The GEO Group, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
707.70M
56.31B
(GEO) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GEO vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The GEO Group, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
25.1%
81.9%
Portfolio components
GEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 177.79M and revenue of 707.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

GEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.83M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

GEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a net income of 31.77M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GEO and META have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEO has higher volatility (21.77%) compared to META (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEO dropped -86.59% vs META's -76.74%.

GEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.27 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEO and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer