PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GEO vs. CXW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GEOCXW
YTD Return135.18%48.11%
1Y Return165.59%54.71%
3Y Return (Ann)38.75%23.69%
5Y Return (Ann)15.67%8.24%
10Y Return (Ann)5.42%-0.69%
Sharpe Ratio2.851.06
Sortino Ratio4.342.05
Omega Ratio1.521.29
Calmar Ratio2.921.00
Martin Ratio11.854.30
Ulcer Index14.68%13.62%
Daily Std Dev61.09%55.49%
Max Drawdown-86.59%-97.76%
Current Drawdown-3.81%-21.22%

Fundamentals


GEOCXW
Market Cap$3.50B$2.64B
EPS$0.25$0.63
PE Ratio100.2035.13
PEG Ratio2.151.44
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.82B$1.97B
Gross Profit (TTM)$409.22M$384.39M
EBITDA (TTM)$346.04M$280.65M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between GEO and CXW is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GEO vs. CXW - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GEO achieves a 135.18% return, which is significantly higher than CXW's 48.11% return. Over the past 10 years, GEO has outperformed CXW with an annualized return of 5.42%, while CXW has yielded a comparatively lower -0.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
92.52%
42.42%
GEO
CXW

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GEO vs. CXW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GEO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GEO, currently valued at 2.85, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GEO, currently valued at 4.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GEO, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.52
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GEO, currently valued at 2.92, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.92
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GEO, currently valued at 11.85, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.85
CXW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CXW, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CXW, currently valued at 2.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CXW, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CXW, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.00
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CXW, currently valued at 4.30, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.30

GEO vs. CXW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the CXW Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEO and CXW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.85
1.06
GEO
CXW

Dividends

GEO vs. CXW - Dividend Comparison

Neither GEO nor CXW has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GEO
The GEO Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%3.23%20.09%11.56%9.54%7.95%7.24%8.68%5.77%6.36%
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.44%7.59%9.65%7.47%8.34%8.15%5.61%26.82%

Drawdowns

GEO vs. CXW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEO drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, smaller than the maximum CXW drawdown of -97.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEO and CXW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.81%
-21.22%
GEO
CXW

Volatility

GEO vs. CXW - Volatility Comparison

The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a higher volatility of 39.48% compared to CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) at 36.42%. This indicates that GEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
39.48%
36.42%
GEO
CXW

Financials

GEO vs. CXW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The GEO Group, Inc. and CoreCivic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items