PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEO vs. CXW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GEO vs. CXW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEO achieves a 85.86% return, which is significantly higher than CXW's 55.57% return. Over the past 10 years, GEO has outperformed CXW with an annualized return of 7.76%, while CXW has yielded a comparatively lower 2.05% annualized return.


GEO

1D
0.98%
1M
27.38%
YTD
85.86%
6M
84.82%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
62.13%
5Y*
32.06%
10Y*
7.76%

CXW

1D
0.27%
1M
38.28%
YTD
55.57%
6M
56.56%
1Y
45.10%
3Y*
46.53%
5Y*
20.61%
10Y*
2.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEO vs. CXW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GEO
The GEO Group, Inc.
85.86%-42.39%158.36%-1.10%41.29%-9.92%-39.13%-6.80%-9.35%5.08%
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
55.57%-12.10%49.62%25.69%15.95%52.21%-59.85%4.44%-13.99%-1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GEO and CXW is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 1997

0.51

Over the past year, GEO and CXW have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

GEO:

$1.83

CXW:

$1.60

PE Ratio

GEO:

16.40

CXW:

18.53

PEG Ratio

GEO:

0.09

CXW:

0.46

PS Ratio

GEO:

1.59

CXW:

1.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

GEO:

$2.63B

CXW:

$2.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GEO:

$1.59B

CXW:

$404.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

GEO:

$590.25M

CXW:

$309.65M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEO vs. CXW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEO
GEO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

CXW
CXW Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CXW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXW Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CXW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEO vs. CXW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GEOCXWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

1.60

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

3.24

-2.32

GEO vs. CXW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the CXW Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEO and CXW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GEO vs. CXW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEO drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, smaller than the maximum CXW drawdown of -98.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEO and CXW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEOCXWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.59%

-98.54%

+11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.89%

-28.41%

-21.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.49%

-32.62%

-29.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.49%

-39.68%

-22.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.82%

-77.93%

+0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.25%

0.00%

-15.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.89%

-56.64%

+17.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.29%

13.95%

+16.34%

Volatility

GEO vs. CXW - Volatility Comparison

The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) have volatilities of 10.07% and 10.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEOCXWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.07%

10.17%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.25%

29.82%

+11.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.47%

37.96%

+13.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.63%

43.40%

+8.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.87%

49.35%

+2.52%

Dividends

GEO vs. CXW - Dividend Comparison

Neither GEO nor CXW has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.44%7.59%9.65%7.47%8.34%8.15%
GEO
The GEO Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.23%20.09%11.56%9.54%7.95%7.24%8.68%

Financials

GEO vs. CXW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The GEO Group, Inc. and CoreCivic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


450.00M500.00M550.00M600.00M650.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
707.70M
614.73M
(GEO) Total Revenue
(CXW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GEO vs. CXW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The GEO Group, Inc. and CoreCivic, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
25.1%
0
Portfolio components
GEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 177.79M and revenue of 707.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

CXW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 614.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.83M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

CXW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 614.73M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

GEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a net income of 31.77M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.

CXW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a net income of 37.92M and revenue of 614.73M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GEO and CXW have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CXW has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to GEO (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEO dropped -86.59% vs CXW's -98.54%.

CXW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEO and CXW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer