GEO vs. CXW
GEO (The GEO Group, Inc.) and CXW (CoreCivic, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — GEO in REIT - Healthcare Facilities, CXW in REIT - Specialty. Over the past 10 years, GEO returned 5.09%/yr vs -1.25%/yr for CXW. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GEO vs. CXW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEO achieves a 45.04% return, which is significantly higher than CXW's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GEO has outperformed CXW with an annualized return of 5.09%, while CXW has yielded a comparatively lower -1.25% annualized return.
GEO
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 24.69%
- YTD
- 45.04%
- 6M
- 40.59%
- 1Y
- -13.66%
- 3Y*
- 46.02%
- 5Y*
- 30.96%
- 10Y*
- 5.09%
CXW
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 16.79%
- 1Y
- -2.60%
- 3Y*
- 33.82%
- 5Y*
- 18.67%
- 10Y*
- -1.25%
GEO vs. CXW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEO The GEO Group, Inc. | 45.04% | -42.39% | 158.36% | -1.10% | 41.29% | -9.92% | -39.13% | -6.80% | -9.35% | 5.08% |
CXW CoreCivic, Inc. | 11.72% | -12.10% | 49.62% | 25.69% | 15.95% | 52.21% | -59.85% | 4.44% | -13.99% | -1.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEO and CXW is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 1997 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, GEO and CXW have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
GEO:
$1.83
CXW:
$1.60
GEO:
12.80
CXW:
13.31
GEO:
0.07
CXW:
0.33
GEO:
1.24
CXW:
0.74
GEO:
$2.63B
CXW:
$2.34B
GEO:
$1.59B
CXW:
$404.76M
GEO:
$590.25M
CXW:
$309.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEO vs. CXW — Risk / Return Rank
GEO
CXW
GEO vs. CXW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GEO | CXW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | -0.07 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | 0.16 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.02 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | -0.10 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | -0.20 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GEO | CXW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | -0.07 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.43 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | -0.03 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.01 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
GEO vs. CXW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEO drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, smaller than the maximum CXW drawdown of -98.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEO and CXW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEO | CXW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.59% | -98.54% | +11.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.82% | -28.41% | -22.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.49% | -32.62% | -29.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.49% | -39.68% | -22.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.82% | -77.93% | +0.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.86% | -27.26% | -6.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.93% | -56.73% | +17.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.72% | 14.06% | +17.66% |
Volatility
GEO vs. CXW - Volatility Comparison
The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a higher volatility of 21.77% compared to CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) at 15.50%. This indicates that GEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEO | CXW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.77% | 15.50% | +6.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.78% | 28.09% | +12.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.55% | 36.70% | +14.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.55% | 44.11% | +11.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.78% | 49.21% | +2.57% |
Dividends
GEO vs. CXW - Dividend Comparison
Neither GEO nor CXW has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXW CoreCivic, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.44% | 7.59% | 9.65% | 7.47% | 8.34% | 8.15% |
GEO The GEO Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.23% | 20.09% | 11.56% | 9.54% | 7.95% | 7.24% | 8.68% |
Financials
GEO vs. CXW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The GEO Group, Inc. and CoreCivic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GEO vs. CXW - Profitability Comparison
GEO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 177.79M and revenue of 707.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.
CXW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 614.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GEO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.83M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
CXW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 614.73M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
GEO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a net income of 31.77M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
CXW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a net income of 37.92M and revenue of 614.73M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GEO and CXW have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GEO has higher volatility (21.77%) compared to CXW (15.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEO dropped -86.59% vs CXW's -98.54%.
CXW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GEO and CXW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer