GEO vs. CXW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW).

Performance

GEO vs. CXW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GEO vs. CXW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GEO The GEO Group, Inc.	7.51%	-42.39%	158.36%	-1.10%	41.29%	-9.92%	-39.13%	-6.80%	-9.35%	5.08%
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.	0.10%	-12.10%	49.62%	25.69%	15.95%	52.21%	-59.85%	4.44%	-13.99%	-1.98%

Fundamentals

EPS GEO : $1.83 CXW : $1.60
PE Ratio GEO : 9.49 CXW : 11.95
PEG Ratio GEO : 0.05 CXW : 0.29
PS Ratio GEO : 0.92 CXW : 0.63
Total Revenue (TTM) GEO : $2.63B CXW : $2.21B
Gross Profit (TTM) GEO : $1.59B CXW : $384.59M
EBITDA (TTM) GEO : $587.43M CXW : $293.19M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEO achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly higher than CXW's 0.10% return. Over the past 10 years, GEO has outperformed CXW with an annualized return of 1.92%, while CXW has yielded a comparatively lower -1.68% annualized return.

GEO

• 1D: 3.09%
• 1M: 13.34%
• YTD: 7.51%
• 6M: -19.84%
• 1Y: -42.10%
• 3Y*: 29.99%
• 5Y*: 17.65%
• 10Y*: 1.92%

CXW

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 5.17%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 6M: -6.91%
• 1Y: -7.14%
• 3Y*: 27.64%
• 5Y*: 16.70%
• 10Y*: -1.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GEO vs. CXW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEO

GEO Risk / Return Rank: 13
GEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
GEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
GEO Omega Ratio Rank: 10
GEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
GEO Martin Ratio Rank: 21

CXW

CXW Risk / Return Rank: 31
CXW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
CXW Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CXW Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CXW Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CXW Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEO vs. CXW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GEO	CXW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.85	-0.21	-0.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.07	-0.05	-1.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	0.99	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	-0.19	-0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.07	-0.37	-0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GEO vs. CXW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the CXW Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEO and CXW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GEO	CXW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.85	-0.21	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.37	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	-0.03	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.00	+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between GEO and CXW is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GEO vs. CXW - Dividend Comparison

Neither GEO nor CXW has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GEO The GEO Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.23%	20.09%	11.56%	9.54%	7.95%	7.24%	8.68%
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	13.44%	7.59%	9.65%	7.47%	8.34%	8.15%

Drawdowns

GEO vs. CXW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEO drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, smaller than the maximum CXW drawdown of -98.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEO and CXW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GEO	CXW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.59%	-98.54%	+11.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-58.13%	-30.05%	-28.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.49%	-39.68%	-22.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.82%	-77.93%	+0.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.98%	-34.82%	-16.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.91%	-56.89%	+17.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.09%	15.30%	+22.79%

Volatility

GEO vs. CXW - Volatility Comparison

The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a higher volatility of 13.54% compared to CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) at 10.88%. This indicates that GEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GEO	CXW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.54%	10.88%	+2.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.65%	27.66%	+9.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.97%	34.66%	+15.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.84%	45.00%	+10.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.21%	48.96%	+2.25%

Financials

GEO vs. CXW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The GEO Group, Inc. and CoreCivic, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 177.79M and revenue of 707.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

CXW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 603.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.83M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

CXW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 603.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

GEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a net income of 31.77M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.

CXW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a net income of 26.54M and revenue of 603.95M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.