PortfoliosLab logo
GEO vs. CXW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GEO and CXW is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GEO vs. CXW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GEO:

1.50

CXW:

0.79

Sortino Ratio

GEO:

2.69

CXW:

1.65

Omega Ratio

GEO:

1.31

CXW:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

GEO:

2.13

CXW:

0.76

Martin Ratio

GEO:

5.58

CXW:

2.71

Ulcer Index

GEO:

18.11%

CXW:

16.44%

Daily Std Dev

GEO:

67.05%

CXW:

57.53%

Max Drawdown

GEO:

-86.59%

CXW:

-97.76%

Current Drawdown

GEO:

-25.40%

CXW:

-19.87%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GEO:

$3.73B

CXW:

$2.39B

EPS

GEO:

$0.22

CXW:

$0.77

PE Ratio

GEO:

119.86

CXW:

28.43

PEG Ratio

GEO:

2.40

CXW:

1.44

PS Ratio

GEO:

1.54

CXW:

1.23

PB Ratio

GEO:

2.83

CXW:

1.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

GEO:

$2.42B

CXW:

$1.95B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GEO:

$2.42B

CXW:

$426.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

GEO:

$337.19M

CXW:

$305.84M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEO achieves a -5.75% return, which is significantly lower than CXW's 0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GEO has outperformed CXW with an annualized return of 5.94%, while CXW has yielded a comparatively lower -0.67% annualized return.


GEO

YTD

-5.75%

1M

-11.18%

6M

-0.86%

1Y

96.50%

5Y*

21.01%

10Y*

5.94%

CXW

YTD

0.69%

1M

-1.44%

6M

2.48%

1Y

45.64%

5Y*

13.55%

10Y*

-0.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GEO vs. CXW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GEO is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GEO is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GEO is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GEO is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GEO is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GEO is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CXW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CXW is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CXW is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CXW is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CXW is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CXW is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CXW is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GEO vs. CXW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the CXW Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEO and CXW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GEO vs. CXW - Dividend Comparison

Neither GEO nor CXW has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GEO
The GEO Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.23%20.09%11.56%9.54%7.95%7.24%8.68%5.77%
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.44%7.59%9.65%7.47%8.34%8.15%5.61%

Drawdowns

GEO vs. CXW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEO drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, smaller than the maximum CXW drawdown of -97.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEO and CXW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GEO vs. CXW - Volatility Comparison

The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a higher volatility of 16.79% compared to CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) at 6.48%. This indicates that GEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GEO vs. CXW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The GEO Group, Inc. and CoreCivic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


450.00M500.00M550.00M600.00M20212022202320242025
604.65M
488.63M
(GEO) Total Revenue
(CXW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GEO vs. CXW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The GEO Group, Inc. and CoreCivic, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
23.3%
(GEO) Gross Margin
(CXW) Gross Margin
GEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 604.65M and revenue of 604.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CXW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 113.89M and revenue of 488.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.3%.

GEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The GEO Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 60.98M and revenue of 604.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

CXW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. reported an operating income of 47.36M and revenue of 488.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

GEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a net income of 19.56M and revenue of 604.65M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.

CXW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a net income of 25.11M and revenue of 488.63M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.