GEO vs. CRWD
Compare and contrast key facts about The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GEO or CRWD.
Correlation
The correlation between GEO and CRWD is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
GEO vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GEO:
1.41
CRWD:
0.01
GEO:
2.71
CRWD:
0.36
GEO:
1.31
CRWD:
1.05
GEO:
1.94
CRWD:
0.01
GEO:
5.22
CRWD:
0.03
GEO:
17.65%
CRWD:
19.21%
GEO:
65.28%
CRWD:
49.48%
GEO:
-86.59%
CRWD:
-67.69%
GEO:
-23.59%
CRWD:
-29.37%
Fundamentals
GEO:
$3.86B
CRWD:
$79.72B
GEO:
$0.22
CRWD:
-$0.06
GEO:
2.36
CRWD:
3.75
GEO:
$1.82B
CRWD:
$3.95B
GEO:
$1.37B
CRWD:
$2.96B
GEO:
$325.08M
CRWD:
$241.30M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEO achieves a -3.47% return, which is significantly higher than CRWD's -6.00% return.
GEO
-3.47%
12.49%
101.42%
78.40%
21.25%
5.14%
CRWD
-6.00%
-3.56%
10.06%
1.94%
40.28%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GEO vs. CRWD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GEO
CRWD
GEO vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GEO vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison
Neither GEO nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEO The GEO Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.23% | 20.09% | 11.56% | 9.54% | 7.95% | 7.24% | 8.68% | 5.77% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GEO vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEO drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than CRWD's maximum drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEO and CRWD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GEO vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) is 18.23%, while CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a volatility of 22.61%. This indicates that GEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GEO vs. CRWD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The GEO Group, Inc. and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
User Portfolios with GEO or CRWD
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
Dividends
Farshad
Feature idea - suggesting new diversified best risk/return options for a portfolio ?
Hi Dimitry,
Do you have any plans to add recommended instruments that will provide better diversification and risk/return for a portfolio like some other sites do ? They claim to do this based on expected future performance, but even based on past performance and past diversification may be a good start ?
RB