GEO vs. CRWD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD).

Performance

GEO vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GEO vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GEO The GEO Group, Inc.	7.51%	-42.39%	158.36%	-1.10%	41.29%	-9.92%	-39.13%	-24.62%
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	-16.10%	37.00%	34.01%	142.49%	-48.58%	-3.34%	324.74%	-14.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GEO : $2.38B CRWD : $101.53B
EPS GEO : $1.83 CRWD : -$0.73
PS Ratio GEO : 0.92 CRWD : 20.59
PB Ratio GEO : 1.58 CRWD : 22.93
Total Revenue (TTM) GEO : $2.63B CRWD : $4.81B
Gross Profit (TTM) GEO : $1.59B CRWD : $3.60B
EBITDA (TTM) GEO : $587.43M CRWD : -$39.16M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEO achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly higher than CRWD's -16.10% return.

GEO

• 1D: 3.09%
• 1M: 13.34%
• YTD: 7.51%
• 6M: -19.84%
• 1Y: -42.10%
• 3Y*: 29.99%
• 5Y*: 17.65%
• 10Y*: 1.92%

CRWD

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: -16.10%
• 6M: -21.33%
• 1Y: 8.54%
• 3Y*: 42.04%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GEO vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEO

GEO Risk / Return Rank: 13
GEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
GEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
GEO Omega Ratio Rank: 10
GEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
GEO Martin Ratio Rank: 21

CRWD

CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 47
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEO vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GEO	CRWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.85	0.19	-1.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.07	0.60	-1.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.08	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	0.31	-1.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.07	0.79	-1.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GEO vs. CRWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the CRWD Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEO and CRWD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GEO	CRWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.85	0.19	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.32	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.58	-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between GEO and CRWD is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GEO vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison

Neither GEO nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GEO The GEO Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.23%	20.09%	11.56%	9.54%	7.95%	7.24%	8.68%
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GEO vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEO drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than CRWD's maximum drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEO and CRWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GEO	CRWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.59%	-67.69%	-18.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-58.13%	-37.18%	-20.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.49%	-67.69%	+5.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.98%	-29.45%	-21.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.91%	-23.93%	-14.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.09%	14.60%	+23.49%

Volatility

GEO vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison

The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) have volatilities of 13.54% and 13.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GEO	CRWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.54%	13.42%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.65%	31.05%	+6.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.97%	45.39%	+4.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.84%	50.17%	+5.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.21%	55.91%	-4.70%

Financials

GEO vs. CRWD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The GEO Group, Inc. and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 177.79M and revenue of 707.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

CRWD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 989.46M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.8%.

GEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.83M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

CRWD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -6.90M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

GEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a net income of 31.77M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.

CRWD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 38.69M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.