GEO vs. BA
GEO (The GEO Group, Inc.) and BA (The Boeing Company) are both stocks. GEO operates in REIT - Healthcare Facilities (Real Estate), while BA operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, GEO returned 7.73%/yr vs 6.05%/yr for BA. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GEO vs. BA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEO achieves a 91.63% return, which is significantly higher than BA's -0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, GEO has outperformed BA with an annualized return of 7.73%, while BA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.05% annualized return.
GEO
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 93.30%
- YTD
- 91.63%
- 1Y
- 23.56%
- 3Y*
- 60.80%
- 5Y*
- 34.88%
- 10Y*
- 7.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.62%
BA
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- 6M
- -7.52%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- -2.60%
- 3Y*
- -3.16%
- 5Y*
- -0.93%
- 10Y*
- 6.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.48B | $1.24B | $1.42B | |
| $40.63M | $47.86M | $53.18M |
GEO vs. BA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEO The GEO Group, Inc. | 91.63% | -42.39% | 158.36% | -1.10% | 41.29% | -9.92% | -39.13% | -6.80% | -9.35% | 5.08% |
BA The Boeing Company | -0.45% | 22.67% | -32.10% | 36.84% | -5.38% | -5.95% | -33.90% | 3.34% | 11.50% | 94.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEO and BA is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 1994 | 0.24 |
The correlation between GEO and BA shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GEO:
$4.13B
BA:
$170.83B
GEO:
$1.83
BA:
$3.08
GEO:
16.84
BA:
70.14
GEO:
0.10
BA:
10.99
GEO:
1.63
BA:
1.82
GEO:
$2.63B
BA:
$94.00B
GEO:
$1.59B
BA:
$4.40B
GEO:
$590.25M
BA:
$6.95B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEO vs. BA — Risk / Return Rank
GEO
BA
GEO vs. BA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and The Boeing Company (BA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEO | BA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.01 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | -0.10 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | -0.22 | +0.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEO vs. BA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEO drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, roughly equal to the maximum BA drawdown of -89.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEO and BA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEO | BA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.59% | -89.45% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.68% | -24.96% | -23.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.49% | -48.31% | -14.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.49% | -51.62% | -10.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.82% | -77.92% | +0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.62% | -49.77% | +37.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.81% | -31.06% | -7.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.09% | 11.94% | +17.15% |
Volatility
GEO vs. BA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) is 7.49%, while The Boeing Company (BA) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that GEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEO | BA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 10.83% | -3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.19% | 24.73% | +14.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.85% | 32.64% | +18.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.49% | 36.54% | +14.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.90% | 41.70% | +10.20% |
Dividends
GEO vs. BA - Dividend Comparison
Neither GEO nor BA has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BA The Boeing Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.96% | 2.52% | 2.12% | 1.93% | 2.80% | 2.52% |
GEO The GEO Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.23% | 20.09% | 11.56% | 9.54% | 7.95% | 7.24% | 8.68% |
Financials
GEO vs. BA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The GEO Group, Inc. and The Boeing Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GEO vs. BA - Profitability Comparison
GEO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 177.79M and revenue of 707.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.
BA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Boeing Company reported a gross profit of 2.41B and revenue of 24.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.8%.
GEO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.83M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
BA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Boeing Company reported an operating income of 78.00M and revenue of 24.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
GEO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a net income of 31.77M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
BA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Boeing Company reported a net income of -444.00M and revenue of 24.56B, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GEO and BA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BA has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to GEO (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEO dropped -86.59% vs BA's -89.45%.
GEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GEO and BA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer