PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GEO vs. BA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GEOBA
YTD Return125.58%-42.08%
1Y Return163.54%-21.29%
3Y Return (Ann)37.41%-12.18%
5Y Return (Ann)13.64%-15.46%
10Y Return (Ann)4.91%3.32%
Sharpe Ratio2.62-0.62
Sortino Ratio4.19-0.69
Omega Ratio1.500.91
Calmar Ratio2.64-0.32
Martin Ratio10.82-0.70
Ulcer Index14.67%30.15%
Daily Std Dev60.64%33.87%
Max Drawdown-86.59%-88.95%
Current Drawdown0.00%-64.91%

Fundamentals


GEOBA
Market Cap$3.00B$112.88B
EPS$0.35-$12.61
PEG Ratio1.236.53
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.82B$73.29B
Gross Profit (TTM)$409.22M$2.30B
EBITDA (TTM)$346.04M-$3.83B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between GEO and BA is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GEO vs. BA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GEO achieves a 125.58% return, which is significantly higher than BA's -42.08% return. Over the past 10 years, GEO has outperformed BA with an annualized return of 4.91%, while BA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.32% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
81.23%
-15.42%
GEO
BA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GEO vs. BA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and The Boeing Company (BA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GEO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GEO, currently valued at 2.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.62
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GEO, currently valued at 4.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GEO, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.50
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GEO, currently valued at 2.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.64
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GEO, currently valued at 10.82, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0010.82
BA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BA, currently valued at -0.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.62
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BA, currently valued at -0.69, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.69
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BA, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.91
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BA, currently valued at -0.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BA, currently valued at -0.70, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.70

GEO vs. BA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the BA Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEO and BA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.62
-0.62
GEO
BA

Dividends

GEO vs. BA - Dividend Comparison

Neither GEO nor BA has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GEO
The GEO Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%3.23%20.09%11.56%9.54%7.95%7.24%8.68%5.77%6.36%
BA
The Boeing Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.96%2.52%2.12%1.93%2.80%2.52%2.25%1.42%

Drawdowns

GEO vs. BA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEO drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, roughly equal to the maximum BA drawdown of -88.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEO and BA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-64.91%
GEO
BA

Volatility

GEO vs. BA - Volatility Comparison

The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a higher volatility of 38.73% compared to The Boeing Company (BA) at 9.72%. This indicates that GEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
38.73%
9.72%
GEO
BA

Financials

GEO vs. BA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The GEO Group, Inc. and The Boeing Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items