GEO vs. BA

In the year-to-date period, GEO achieves a -4.97% return, which is significantly lower than BA's 14.93% return. Over the past 10 years, GEO has outperformed BA with an annualized return of 6.30%, while BA has yielded a comparatively lower 4.59% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and The Boeing Company (BA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the BA Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEO and BA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither GEO nor BA has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum GEO drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, roughly equal to the maximum BA drawdown of -88.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEO and BA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a higher volatility of 17.23% compared to The Boeing Company (BA) at 8.34%. This indicates that GEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The GEO Group, Inc. and The Boeing Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.