GENC vs. VITL
GENC (Gencor Industries, Inc.) and VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) are both stocks. GENC operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials), while VITL operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, GENC returned 3.56%/yr vs -14.53%/yr for VITL. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GENC vs. VITL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENC achieves a 16.28% return, which is significantly higher than VITL's -69.32% return.
GENC
- 1D
- 5.24%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 16.28%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 10.00%
- 3Y*
- 1.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- 4.39%
VITL
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- -30.89%
- YTD
- -69.32%
- 6M
- -68.55%
- 1Y
- -68.85%
- 3Y*
- -12.66%
- 5Y*
- -14.53%
- 10Y*
- —
GENC vs. VITL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GENC Gencor Industries, Inc. | 16.28% | -26.57% | 9.36% | 59.80% | -12.40% | -6.26% | 2.76% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -69.32% | -15.26% | 140.22% | 5.16% | -17.39% | -28.64% | -28.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENC and VITL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
GENC:
$220.17M
VITL:
$436.96M
GENC:
$1.04
VITL:
$1.05
GENC:
14.54
VITL:
9.35
GENC:
0.36
VITL:
0.02
GENC:
2.14
VITL:
0.57
GENC:
1.00
VITL:
1.32
GENC:
$103.19M
VITL:
$784.41M
GENC:
$29.16M
VITL:
$276.18M
GENC:
$14.86M
VITL:
$82.41M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENC vs. VITL — Risk / Return Rank
GENC
VITL
GENC vs. VITL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gencor Industries, Inc. (GENC) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GENC | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | -1.12 | +1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.68 | -2.16 | +2.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.75 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | -0.82 | +1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | -1.50 | +2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GENC | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | -1.12 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | -0.27 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | -0.37 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
GENC vs. VITL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENC drawdown since its inception was -84.52%, roughly equal to the maximum VITL drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENC and VITL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENC | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.52% | -84.20% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.70% | -84.20% | +58.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.66% | -84.20% | +28.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.66% | -84.20% | +28.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.81% | -81.30% | +42.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.53% | -47.19% | +1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.66% | 46.00% | -33.34% |
Volatility
GENC vs. VITL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gencor Industries, Inc. (GENC) is 11.31%, while Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a volatility of 30.93%. This indicates that GENC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENC | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.31% | 30.93% | -19.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.95% | 48.39% | -21.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.26% | 61.35% | -21.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.62% | 54.21% | -17.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.92% | 53.80% | -17.88% |
Dividends
GENC vs. VITL - Dividend Comparison
Neither GENC nor VITL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GENC vs. VITL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gencor Industries, Inc. and Vital Farms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GENC vs. VITL - Profitability Comparison
GENC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gencor Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.71M and revenue of 33.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.7%.
VITL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.01M and revenue of 187.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.
GENC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gencor Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.16M and revenue of 33.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.
VITL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.33M and revenue of 187.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.3%.
GENC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gencor Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 5.99M and revenue of 33.80M, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
VITL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported a net income of -1.52M and revenue of 187.16M, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GENC and VITL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (30.93%) compared to GENC (11.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENC dropped -84.52% vs VITL's -84.20%.
GENC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GENC and VITL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer