PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEN vs. ASML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GEN vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gen Digital Inc. (GEN) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEN achieves a -13.54% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 66.82% return. Over the past 10 years, GEN has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 9.01%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 35.31% annualized return.


GEN

1D
1.09%
1M
-6.29%
YTD
-13.54%
6M
-14.36%
1Y
-17.69%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
-1.15%
10Y*
9.01%

ASML

1D
-7.82%
1M
8.91%
YTD
66.82%
6M
68.08%
1Y
129.88%
3Y*
37.97%
5Y*
21.90%
10Y*
35.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEN vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GEN
Gen Digital Inc.
-13.54%1.06%22.41%9.29%-15.81%27.59%44.36%37.17%-31.76%18.69%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
66.82%56.51%-7.70%39.91%-30.49%64.13%66.06%93.56%-9.80%56.23%

Correlation

The correlation between GEN and ASML is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 1995

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between GEN and ASML has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GEN:

$14.17B

ASML:

$685.95B

EPS

GEN:

$1.57

ASML:

€25.86

PE Ratio

GEN:

14.82

ASML:

60.18

PEG Ratio

GEN:

1.02

ASML:

3.96

PS Ratio

GEN:

2.88

ASML:

17.88

PB Ratio

GEN:

5.43

ASML:

28.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

GEN:

$5.00B

ASML:

€33.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GEN:

$3.92B

ASML:

€17.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

GEN:

$2.46B

ASML:

€12.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEN vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEN
GEN Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEN Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEN Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEN vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gen Digital Inc. (GEN) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GENASMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.42

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

7.32

-7.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.80

19.64

-20.44

GEN vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEN and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GEN vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEN drawdown since its inception was -87.75%, roughly equal to the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEN and ASML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GENASMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.75%

-90.00%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.59%

-17.85%

-25.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.59%

-45.38%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.41%

-56.84%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.41%

-56.84%

+8.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.26%

-7.84%

-18.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.27%

-28.10%

-6.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.05%

6.64%

+15.41%

Volatility

GEN vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gen Digital Inc. (GEN) is 12.74%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 18.58%. This indicates that GEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GENASMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.74%

18.58%

-5.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.22%

35.41%

-6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.83%

43.81%

-9.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.46%

42.68%

-11.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.24%

38.80%

-5.56%

Dividends

GEN vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

GEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than ASML's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.49%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
GEN
Gen Digital Inc.
2.15%1.84%1.83%2.19%2.33%1.92%60.15%1.37%1.59%1.07%18.31%2.86%

Financials

GEN vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gen Digital Inc. and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
1.28B
8.77B
(GEN) Total Revenue
(ASML) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GEN values in USD, ASML values in EUR

GEN vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gen Digital Inc. and ASML Holding N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
82.8%
53.0%
Portfolio components
GEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gen Digital Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.06B and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.8%.

ASML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.65B and revenue of 8.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.

GEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gen Digital Inc. reported an operating income of 792.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 61.7%.

ASML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.16B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.

GEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gen Digital Inc. reported a net income of 512.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of 39.9%.

ASML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.76B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GEN and ASML have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASML has higher volatility (18.58%) compared to GEN (12.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEN dropped -87.75% vs ASML's -90.00%.

ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEN and ASML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer