GEI.TO vs. CVE.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Gibson Energy Inc. (GEI.TO) and Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GEI.TO or CVE.TO.
Key characteristics
GEI.TO | CVE.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 18.89% | 1.48% |
1Y Return | 16.70% | -9.58% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 5.56% | 13.65% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 4.26% | 14.44% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 4.21% | -0.44% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.07 | -0.36 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.57 | -0.32 |
Omega Ratio | 1.20 | 0.96 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.77 | -0.30 |
Martin Ratio | 4.85 | -0.78 |
Ulcer Index | 3.38% | 12.69% |
Daily Std Dev | 15.37% | 27.93% |
Max Drawdown | -63.53% | -92.84% |
Current Drawdown | -5.62% | -25.81% |
Fundamentals
GEI.TO | CVE.TO | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | CA$3.68B | CA$40.73B |
EPS | CA$1.28 | CA$1.96 |
PE Ratio | 17.64 | 11.20 |
PEG Ratio | -4.36 | 0.28 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$12.23B | CA$55.67B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$3.61B | CA$8.37B |
EBITDA (TTM) | CA$435.20M | CA$7.99B |
Correlation
The correlation between GEI.TO and CVE.TO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GEI.TO vs. CVE.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GEI.TO achieves a 18.89% return, which is significantly higher than CVE.TO's 1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GEI.TO has outperformed CVE.TO with an annualized return of 4.21%, while CVE.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -0.44% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GEI.TO vs. CVE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gibson Energy Inc. (GEI.TO) and Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GEI.TO vs. CVE.TO - Dividend Comparison
GEI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, more than CVE.TO's 3.57% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gibson Energy Inc. | 7.14% | 7.75% | 6.26% | 6.24% | 6.61% | 4.96% | 7.07% | 7.26% | 6.95% | 9.26% | 4.41% | 4.01% |
Cenovus Energy Inc. | 3.57% | 2.40% | 1.83% | 0.64% | 0.77% | 1.59% | 2.08% | 1.74% | 0.99% | 4.87% | 4.44% | 3.18% |
Drawdowns
GEI.TO vs. CVE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEI.TO drawdown since its inception was -63.53%, smaller than the maximum CVE.TO drawdown of -92.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEI.TO and CVE.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GEI.TO vs. CVE.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gibson Energy Inc. (GEI.TO) is 3.89%, while Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE.TO) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that GEI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GEI.TO vs. CVE.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gibson Energy Inc. and Cenovus Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities