GDXY vs. SQY
GDXY (YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF) and SQY (YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXY is a Gold fund actively managed by YieldMax, while SQY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. GDXY charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SQY.
Performance
GDXY vs. SQY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDXY
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- 6M
- -20.79%
- YTD
- -17.00%
- 1Y
- 15.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SQY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXY vs. SQY — Risk / Return Rank
GDXY
SQY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDXY vs. SQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXY | SQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.14 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXY vs. SQY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXY | SQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.37% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.75% | — | — |
Volatility
GDXY vs. SQY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXY | SQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.87% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.57% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.57% | — | — |
GDXY vs. SQY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXY has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SQY's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXY vs. SQY - Dividend Comparison
GDXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.15%, while SQY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF | 84.15% | 52.13% | 23.91% |
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SQY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SQY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for GDXY.
GDXY has the higher dividend yield at 84.15%, compared with 0.00% for SQY.
GDXY is categorized as Gold, while SQY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for GDXY and 1.01% for SQY.
Find the right allocation for GDXY and SQY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer