GDXY vs. SPMO
GDXY (YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXY is a Derivative Income fund managed by YieldMax, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Over the past year, GDXY returned 30.32% vs 46.00% for SPMO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDXY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
GDXY vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXY achieves a -6.82% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.
GDXY
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -6.82%
- 6M
- -3.09%
- 1Y
- 30.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
GDXY vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF | -6.82% | 88.08% | -11.63% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 17.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXY and SPMO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXY vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
GDXY
SPMO
GDXY vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDXY | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.47 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 3.64 | -2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 14.17 | -11.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXY | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 2.62 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.01 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
GDXY vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXY drawdown since its inception was -28.03%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXY and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXY | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.03% | -30.95% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.03% | -12.70% | -15.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.20% | 0.00% | -25.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.40% | -4.60% | -1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.96% | 3.26% | +7.70% |
Volatility
GDXY vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) has a higher volatility of 11.75% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 7.35%. This indicates that GDXY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXY | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.75% | 7.35% | +4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.92% | 14.39% | +16.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.57% | 17.64% | +18.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.73% | 19.30% | +12.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.73% | 20.31% | +11.42% |
GDXY vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXY vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
GDXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.25%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF | 74.25% | 52.13% | 23.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXY and SPMO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXY has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to SPMO (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXY dropped -28.03% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 1-year performance, SPMO leads with 46.00% vs 30.32% for GDXY. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 46.00% return vs 30.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXY.
GDXY has the higher dividend yield at 74.25%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.
GDXY is categorized as Derivative Income, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXY and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXY and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer