PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDIV vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GDIV vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GDIV vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
-0.04%10.81%14.83%16.45%-1.53%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
-20.81%34.35%58.27%198.04%-39.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDIV achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -20.81% return.


GDIV

1D
2.02%
1M
-6.55%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
3.54%
1Y
15.94%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
10.00%
1M
-15.69%
YTD
-20.81%
6M
-19.12%
1Y
46.49%
3Y*
45.09%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
34.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GDIV vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GDIV vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDIV
GDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDIV vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDIVTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

0.69

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

1.37

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.89

3.87

+2.02

GDIV vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDIV and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDIVTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

0.69

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.64

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between GDIV and TQQQ is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GDIV vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

GDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than TQQQ's 0.76% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
1.19%1.19%1.30%2.27%5.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.76%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

GDIV vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDIV drawdown since its inception was -18.93%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDIV and TQQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GDIVTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.93%

-81.66%

+62.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

-36.97%

+24.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.85%

-30.66%

+22.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-18.66%

+15.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

12.00%

-9.16%

Volatility

GDIV vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) is 4.89%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 19.43%. This indicates that GDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GDIVTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

19.43%

-14.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

38.32%

-29.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.17%

67.26%

-50.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

66.55%

-51.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.40%

65.83%

-50.43%