GCOR vs. IUSB
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) and iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB).
GCOR and IUSB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GCOR is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Broad Bond Market Index. It was launched on Sep 8, 2020. IUSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Universal Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. Both GCOR and IUSB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GCOR or IUSB.
Correlation
The correlation between GCOR and IUSB is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GCOR vs. IUSB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GCOR:
0.34
IUSB:
0.63
GCOR:
0.51
IUSB:
0.93
GCOR:
1.06
IUSB:
1.11
GCOR:
0.14
IUSB:
0.28
GCOR:
0.86
IUSB:
1.70
GCOR:
2.25%
IUSB:
1.92%
GCOR:
5.71%
IUSB:
5.14%
GCOR:
-18.94%
IUSB:
-17.98%
GCOR:
-10.01%
IUSB:
-7.02%
Returns By Period
GCOR
0.16%
-0.02%
0.57%
2.41%
N/A
N/A
IUSB
0.00%
0.00%
1.15%
3.30%
-0.20%
1.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCOR vs. IUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GCOR vs. IUSB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GCOR
IUSB
GCOR vs. IUSB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) and iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GCOR vs. IUSB - Dividend Comparison
GCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than IUSB's 4.04% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOR Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.35% | 4.35% | 3.68% | 2.11% | 0.92% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUSB iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF | 4.04% | 4.04% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.45% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% | 1.39% |
Drawdowns
GCOR vs. IUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOR drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, which is greater than IUSB's maximum drawdown of -17.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOR and IUSB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GCOR vs. IUSB - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) has a higher volatility of 1.57% compared to iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB) at 1.46%. This indicates that GCOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.