PortfoliosLab logo
GCLN vs. QCLN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GCLN and QCLN is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GCLN vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Bloomberg Clean Energy Equity ETF (GCLN) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


GCLN

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QCLN

YTD

-10.05%

1M

7.85%

6M

-13.05%

1Y

-17.15%

3Y*

-18.11%

5Y*

3.01%

10Y*

5.23%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GCLN vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCLN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GCLN vs. QCLN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCLN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GCLN is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GCLN is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GCLN is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GCLN is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GCLN is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GCLN is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QCLN is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QCLN is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QCLN is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QCLN is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QCLN is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QCLN is 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GCLN vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Bloomberg Clean Energy Equity ETF (GCLN) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GCLN vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

GCLN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GCLN
Goldman Sachs Bloomberg Clean Energy Equity ETF
2.24%2.18%1.63%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
1.03%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.25%0.72%0.78%

Drawdowns

GCLN vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GCLN vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...