PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GC=F vs. JNUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GC=F vs. JNUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold (GC=F) and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GC=F achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly higher than JNUG's -13.94% return. Over the past 10 years, GC=F has outperformed JNUG with an annualized return of 13.80%, while JNUG has yielded a comparatively lower -23.85% annualized return.


GC=F

1D
0.98%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
4.48%
6M
7.94%
1Y
34.08%
3Y*
32.28%
5Y*
19.29%
10Y*
13.80%

JNUG

1D
1.51%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
-13.94%
6M
-0.62%
1Y
112.06%
3Y*
71.84%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
-23.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GC=F vs. JNUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GC=F
Gold
4.48%64.52%27.48%13.34%-0.43%-3.47%24.59%18.87%-2.14%13.59%
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares
-13.94%478.59%9.96%-4.79%-43.60%-46.61%-85.51%82.43%-48.11%-20.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GC=F and JNUG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2013

0.63

The correlation between GC=F and JNUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GC=F vs. JNUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GC=F
GC=F Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GC=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GC=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GC=F Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GC=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GC=F Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

JNUG
JNUG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JNUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JNUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GC=F vs. JNUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold (GC=F) and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GC=FJNUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.14

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

1.76

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.45

-0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.15

5.48

-0.33

GC=F vs. JNUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GC=F Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the JNUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GC=F and JNUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GC=FJNUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.14

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.16

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

-0.22

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

-0.29

+0.91

Drawdowns

GC=F vs. JNUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GC=F drawdown since its inception was -44.36%, smaller than the maximum JNUG drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GC=F and JNUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GC=FJNUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.36%

-99.95%

+55.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.73%

-56.39%

+38.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.73%

-56.39%

+38.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.43%

-80.95%

+60.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.87%

-99.66%

+78.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.03%

-99.52%

+84.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.03%

-93.89%

+80.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.01%

25.28%

-18.27%

Volatility

GC=F vs. JNUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gold (GC=F) is 5.37%, while Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) has a volatility of 31.67%. This indicates that GC=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GC=FJNUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

31.67%

-26.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.05%

83.60%

-60.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.56%

99.37%

-72.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

80.40%

-62.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

106.52%

-90.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GC=F and JNUG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNUG has higher volatility (31.67%) compared to GC=F (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GC=F dropped -44.36% vs JNUG's -99.95%.

GC=F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GC=F and JNUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer