PortfoliosLab logo
GC=F vs. FXA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GC=F and FXA is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.0

Performance

GC=F vs. FXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold (GC=F) and Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust (FXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
478.80%
26.73%
GC=F
FXA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GC=F:

2.34

FXA:

0.09

Sortino Ratio

GC=F:

3.01

FXA:

0.19

Omega Ratio

GC=F:

1.42

FXA:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

GC=F:

4.95

FXA:

0.02

Martin Ratio

GC=F:

12.57

FXA:

0.15

Ulcer Index

GC=F:

3.15%

FXA:

5.76%

Daily Std Dev

GC=F:

16.66%

FXA:

10.10%

Max Drawdown

GC=F:

-44.36%

FXA:

-40.97%

Current Drawdown

GC=F:

-1.17%

FXA:

-32.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GC=F achieves a 28.04% return, which is significantly higher than FXA's 4.00% return. Over the past 10 years, GC=F has outperformed FXA with an annualized return of 9.46%, while FXA has yielded a comparatively lower -1.40% annualized return.


GC=F

YTD

28.04%

1M

11.33%

6M

23.09%

1Y

44.82%

5Y*

12.55%

10Y*

9.46%

FXA

YTD

4.00%

1M

1.85%

6M

-2.84%

1Y

0.02%

5Y*

0.52%

10Y*

-1.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GC=F vs. FXA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GC=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GC=F is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FXA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FXA is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FXA is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FXA is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FXA is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FXA is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FXA is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GC=F vs. FXA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold (GC=F) and Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust (FXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.34, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.00
GC=F: 2.34
FXA: -0.30
The chart of Sortino ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 3.01, compared to the broader market0.001.002.00
GC=F: 3.01
FXA: -0.35
The chart of Omega ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.30
GC=F: 1.42
FXA: 0.95
The chart of Calmar ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 4.95, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
GC=F: 4.95
FXA: -0.08
The chart of Martin ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 12.57, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
GC=F: 12.57
FXA: -0.49

The current GC=F Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the FXA Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GC=F and FXA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.34
-0.30
GC=F
FXA

Drawdowns

GC=F vs. FXA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GC=F drawdown since its inception was -44.36%, which is greater than FXA's maximum drawdown of -40.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GC=F and FXA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-1.17%
-32.86%
GC=F
FXA

Volatility

GC=F vs. FXA - Volatility Comparison

Gold (GC=F) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust (FXA) at 6.12%. This indicates that GC=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
9.01%
6.12%
GC=F
FXA