PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBTC vs. MARA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBTC vs. MARA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBTC achieves a -27.82% return, which is significantly lower than MARA's 54.57% return. Over the past 10 years, GBTC has outperformed MARA with an annualized return of 49.21%, while MARA has yielded a comparatively lower -11.03% annualized return.


GBTC

1D
-2.74%
1M
-22.25%
YTD
-27.82%
6M
-31.83%
1Y
-40.35%
3Y*
53.36%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*
49.21%

MARA

1D
-0.57%
1M
14.14%
YTD
54.57%
6M
11.58%
1Y
-11.42%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
-10.63%
10Y*
-11.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBTC vs. MARA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
-27.82%-7.65%113.81%317.61%-75.80%7.03%290.72%106.56%-82.10%1,787.72%
MARA
MARA Holdings, Inc.
54.57%-46.45%-28.61%586.84%-89.59%214.75%1,084.48%-39.16%-91.17%-40.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GBTC and MARA is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2015

0.50

The correlation between GBTC and MARA shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

GBTC:

$0.00

MARA:

$867.82M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GBTC:

$0.00

MARA:

$164.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

GBTC:

$4.58B

MARA:

$373.68M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBTC vs. MARA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBTC
GBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

MARA
MARA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MARA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MARA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARA Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBTC vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBTCMARADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.04

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

-0.16

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.40

-0.27

-1.13

GBTC vs. MARA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the MARA Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBTC and MARA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBTCMARADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

-0.15

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

-0.10

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

-0.08

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

-0.09

+0.74

Drawdowns

GBTC vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBTC drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, smaller than the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBTC and MARA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBTCMARADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.91%

-99.74%

+9.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.87%

-70.53%

+20.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.87%

-78.34%

+28.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.42%

-95.87%

+10.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.91%

-99.20%

+9.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.87%

-91.03%

+41.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.43%

-78.00%

+34.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.81%

42.10%

-13.29%

Volatility

GBTC vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) is 9.07%, while MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that GBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MARA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBTCMARADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

16.25%

-7.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.86%

57.91%

-24.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.69%

77.37%

-33.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.44%

105.78%

-43.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.20%

144.03%

-61.83%

Dividends

GBTC vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison

Neither GBTC nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.61%
MARA
MARA Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBTC and MARA have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MARA has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to GBTC (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBTC dropped -89.91% vs MARA's -99.74%.

MARA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBTC and MARA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer