GBTC vs. MARA
GBTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index, while MARA (MARA Holdings, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GBTC returned 45.83%/yr vs -13.02%/yr for MARA. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GBTC vs. MARA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBTC achieves a -26.36% return, which is significantly lower than MARA's 36.86% return. Over the past 10 years, GBTC has outperformed MARA with an annualized return of 45.83%, while MARA has yielded a comparatively lower -13.02% annualized return.
GBTC
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- 6M
- -34.03%
- YTD
- -26.36%
- 1Y
- -45.06%
- 3Y*
- 36.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.95%
- 10Y*
- 45.83%
MARA
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -16.05%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- YTD
- 36.86%
- 1Y
- -34.49%
- 3Y*
- -12.06%
- 5Y*
- -12.03%
- 10Y*
- -13.02%
GBTC vs. MARA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | -26.36% | -7.65% | 113.81% | 317.61% | -75.80% | 7.03% | 290.72% | 106.56% | -82.10% | 1,787.72% |
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc. | 36.86% | -46.45% | -28.61% | 586.84% | -89.59% | 214.75% | 1,084.48% | -39.16% | -91.17% | -40.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBTC and MARA is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2015 | 0.50 |
The correlation between GBTC and MARA shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GBTC:
$0.00
MARA:
$867.82M
GBTC:
$0.00
MARA:
$164.95M
GBTC:
$4.58B
MARA:
$373.68M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBTC vs. MARA — Risk / Return Rank
GBTC
MARA
GBTC vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GBTC | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.98 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | -0.49 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -0.78 | -0.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GBTC vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBTC drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, smaller than the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBTC and MARA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBTC | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.91% | -99.74% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.75% | -70.53% | +16.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.75% | -78.34% | +24.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.42% | -95.87% | +10.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.91% | -99.20% | +9.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.86% | -92.06% | +43.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.49% | -78.08% | +34.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.24% | 44.18% | -10.94% |
Volatility
GBTC vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) is 11.69%, while MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) has a volatility of 19.80%. This indicates that GBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MARA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBTC | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.69% | 19.80% | -8.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.91% | 60.57% | -25.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.36% | 79.34% | -34.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.84% | 106.01% | -44.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.44% | 144.21% | -62.77% |
Dividends
GBTC vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison
Neither GBTC nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.61% |
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBTC and MARA have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MARA has higher volatility (19.80%) compared to GBTC (11.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBTC dropped -89.91% vs MARA's -99.74%.
MARA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GBTC and MARA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer