GBR vs. GS

In the year-to-date period, GBR achieves a -21.56% return, which is significantly lower than GS's 5.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GBR has underperformed GS with an annualized return of -7.10%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.53% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Concept Energy, Inc. (GBR) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GBR Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the GS Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBR and GS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%.

The maximum GBR drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, which is greater than GS's maximum drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBR and GS.

New Concept Energy, Inc. (GBR) has a higher volatility of 20.60% compared to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) at 7.55%. This indicates that GBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between New Concept Energy, Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.