PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBPUSD=X vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GBPUSD=X vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GBPUSD=X vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBPUSD=X
GBP/USD
-1.65%7.55%-1.67%5.28%-10.69%-0.91%3.06%4.01%-5.66%9.52%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.84%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBPUSD=X achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.84% return. Over the past 10 years, GBPUSD=X has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -0.75%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.29% annualized return.


GBPUSD=X

1D
-0.48%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
-1.65%
6M
-1.51%
1Y
1.82%
3Y*
2.17%
5Y*
-0.86%
10Y*
-0.75%

^GSPC

1D
0.11%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
-3.84%
6M
-1.98%
1Y
16.08%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
12.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBPUSD=X vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBPUSD=X
GBPUSD=X Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GBPUSD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBPUSD=X vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBPUSD=X^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.22

0.88

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.36

1.37

-1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.21

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

1.39

-1.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.03

6.43

-7.47

GBPUSD=X vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBPUSD=X Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBPUSD=X and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBPUSD=X^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

0.88

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.62

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

0.68

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

0.46

-0.68

Correlation

The correlation between GBPUSD=X and ^GSPC is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

GBPUSD=X vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBPUSD=X drawdown since its inception was -49.29%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBPUSD=X and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GBPUSD=X^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.29%

-56.78%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.26%

-9.10%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.78%

-25.43%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.99%

-33.92%

+5.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.20%

-5.67%

-31.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.76%

-10.75%

-20.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.62%

+0.07%

Volatility

GBPUSD=X vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) is 2.56%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that GBPUSD=X experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GBPUSD=X^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

5.29%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.64%

9.55%

-4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.79%

18.33%

-11.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.28%

16.90%

-8.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.14%

18.04%

-8.90%