PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBIL vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBIL vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBIL achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.


GBIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.73%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*

SCHD

1D
0.59%
1M
1.60%
YTD
19.01%
6M
20.36%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBIL vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
1.40%4.12%5.24%4.91%1.05%-0.08%0.79%2.31%1.78%0.69%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GBIL and SCHD is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2016

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBIL vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBIL
GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBIL vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBILSCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

16.76

2.57

+14.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

102.35

3.98

+98.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

39.22

1.46

+37.76

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

195.38

6.17

+189.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1,603.24

15.20

+1,588.04

GBIL vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBIL Sharpe Ratio is 16.76, which is higher than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBIL and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBILSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.76

2.57

+14.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.77

0.59

+5.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.87

0.86

+4.01

Drawdowns

GBIL vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBIL and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBILSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-33.37%

+32.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-4.61%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.76%

-16.13%

+15.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.76%

-16.85%

+16.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.40%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-3.32%

+3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

1.87%

-1.87%

Volatility

GBIL vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) is 0.04%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that GBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBILSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.04%

2.92%

-2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

7.66%

-7.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23%

10.96%

-10.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.58%

14.38%

-13.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.47%

16.72%

-16.25%

GBIL vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBIL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GBIL vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

GBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
3.74%4.02%4.93%4.77%1.37%0.00%0.81%2.20%1.70%0.74%0.11%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBIL and SCHD have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to GBIL (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBIL dropped -0.76% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 5-year performance, SCHD leads with 8.49% vs 3.31% for GBIL. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, GBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 8.49% return vs 3.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GBIL.

GBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 3.26% for SCHD.

GBIL is categorized as Government Bonds, while SCHD is Dividend. GBIL tracks FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GBIL and 0.06% for SCHD.

GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.76 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBIL and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer