GBF.DE vs. AEM.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Bilfinger SE (GBF.DE) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GBF.DE or AEM.TO.
Key characteristics
| GBF.DE | AEM.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 32.99% | 71.27% |
| 1Y Return | 33.76% | 92.37% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 22.09% | 26.10% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.22% | 11.40% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.70% | 18.33% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.13 | 3.35 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.68 | 4.06 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.23 | 1.52 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.78 | 2.14 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.57 | 17.44 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.61% | 5.17% |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.61% | 26.92% |
| Max Drawdown | -83.07% | -84.31% |
| Current Drawdown | -17.15% | -0.85% |
Fundamentals
| GBF.DE | AEM.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | €1.67B | CA$62.00B |
| EPS | €5.66 | CA$1.61 |
| PE Ratio | 7.88 | 76.21 |
| PEG Ratio | -171.80 | 28.26 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | €3.59B | CA$5.66B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | €374.50M | CA$2.20B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | €197.80M | CA$2.89B |
Correlation
The correlation between GBF.DE and AEM.TO is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GBF.DE vs. AEM.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GBF.DE achieves a 32.99% return, which is significantly lower than AEM.TO's 71.27% return. Over the past 10 years, GBF.DE has underperformed AEM.TO with an annualized return of 3.70%, while AEM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.33% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GBF.DE vs. AEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bilfinger SE (GBF.DE) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GBF.DE vs. AEM.TO - Dividend Comparison
GBF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than AEM.TO's 1.30% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBF.DE Bilfinger SE | 4.04% | 5.60% | 3.69% | 6.29% | 4.33% | 2.89% | 3.92% | 2.53% | 1.37% | 4.60% | 6.47% | 3.68% |
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.30% | 2.20% | 2.27% | 2.71% | 1.06% | 0.69% | 0.80% | 0.71% | 0.82% | 0.88% | 1.42% | 3.97% |
Drawdowns
GBF.DE vs. AEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBF.DE drawdown since its inception was -83.07%, roughly equal to the maximum AEM.TO drawdown of -84.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBF.DE and AEM.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GBF.DE vs. AEM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Bilfinger SE (GBF.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.15% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) at 7.44%. This indicates that GBF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GBF.DE vs. AEM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bilfinger SE and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities