GBF.DE vs. 1810.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about Bilfinger SE (GBF.DE) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GBF.DE or 1810.HK.
Key characteristics
| GBF.DE | 1810.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 32.99% | 66.67% |
| 1Y Return | 33.76% | 85.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 22.09% | 6.96% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.22% | 24.41% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.13 | 2.16 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.68 | 2.89 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.23 | 1.35 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.78 | 1.39 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.57 | 7.21 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.61% | 12.69% |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.61% | 42.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -83.07% | -76.06% |
| Current Drawdown | -17.15% | -26.35% |
Fundamentals
| GBF.DE | 1810.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | €1.67B | HK$671.12B |
| EPS | €5.66 | HK$0.70 |
| PE Ratio | 7.88 | 33.21 |
| PEG Ratio | -171.80 | 1.41 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | €3.59B | HK$162.13B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | €374.50M | HK$34.01B |
Correlation
The correlation between GBF.DE and 1810.HK is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GBF.DE vs. 1810.HK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GBF.DE achieves a 32.99% return, which is significantly lower than 1810.HK's 66.67% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GBF.DE vs. 1810.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bilfinger SE (GBF.DE) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GBF.DE vs. 1810.HK - Dividend Comparison
GBF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, while 1810.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBF.DE Bilfinger SE | 4.04% | 5.60% | 3.69% | 6.29% | 4.33% | 2.89% | 3.92% | 2.53% | 1.37% | 4.60% | 6.47% | 3.68% |
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GBF.DE vs. 1810.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBF.DE drawdown since its inception was -83.07%, which is greater than 1810.HK's maximum drawdown of -76.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBF.DE and 1810.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GBF.DE vs. 1810.HK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bilfinger SE (GBF.DE) is 12.15%, while Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) has a volatility of 15.66%. This indicates that GBF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1810.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GBF.DE vs. 1810.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bilfinger SE and Xiaomi Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities