PortfoliosLab logo
GBAB vs. VGM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GBAB and VGM is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GBAB vs. VGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) and Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals (VGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GBAB:

0.40

VGM:

0.53

Sortino Ratio

GBAB:

0.52

VGM:

0.92

Omega Ratio

GBAB:

1.07

VGM:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

GBAB:

0.20

VGM:

0.30

Martin Ratio

GBAB:

0.45

VGM:

2.49

Ulcer Index

GBAB:

9.62%

VGM:

2.66%

Daily Std Dev

GBAB:

13.53%

VGM:

10.97%

Max Drawdown

GBAB:

-35.81%

VGM:

-49.41%

Current Drawdown

GBAB:

-17.22%

VGM:

-17.22%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GBAB:

$407.06M

VGM:

$526.05M

EPS

GBAB:

$1.96

VGM:

$0.38

PE Ratio

GBAB:

7.78

VGM:

25.53

PEG Ratio

GBAB:

0.00

VGM:

0.00

PS Ratio

GBAB:

8.61

VGM:

12.44

PB Ratio

GBAB:

0.98

VGM:

0.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

GBAB:

$12.32M

VGM:

$20.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GBAB:

$8.83M

VGM:

$17.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

GBAB:

$52.98M

VGM:

$22.62M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBAB achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly higher than VGM's -1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GBAB has outperformed VGM with an annualized return of 4.19%, while VGM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.54% annualized return.


GBAB

YTD

3.62%

1M

5.27%

6M

-1.71%

1Y

5.53%

5Y*

-0.32%

10Y*

4.19%

VGM

YTD

-1.44%

1M

3.45%

6M

-1.84%

1Y

6.10%

5Y*

1.30%

10Y*

2.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GBAB vs. VGM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBAB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GBAB is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GBAB is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GBAB is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GBAB is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GBAB is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GBAB is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VGM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VGM is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VGM is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VGM is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VGM is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VGM is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VGM is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GBAB vs. VGM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) and Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals (VGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GBAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is comparable to the VGM Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBAB and VGM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GBAB vs. VGM - Dividend Comparison

GBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.90%, more than VGM's 7.73% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GBAB
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
9.90%9.93%9.32%9.22%6.36%5.92%6.37%6.88%6.64%7.51%7.78%7.48%
VGM
Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals
7.73%6.35%4.42%5.67%4.65%4.65%4.82%5.98%5.79%6.50%6.62%6.64%

Drawdowns

GBAB vs. VGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBAB drawdown since its inception was -35.81%, smaller than the maximum VGM drawdown of -49.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBAB and VGM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GBAB vs. VGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) is 3.95%, while Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals (VGM) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that GBAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GBAB vs. VGM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust and Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-20.00M-10.00M0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M20202021202220232024
13.19M
20.01M
(GBAB) Total Revenue
(VGM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items