GBAB vs. VGM
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) and Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals (VGM).
Performance
GBAB vs. VGM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GBAB vs. VGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBAB Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust | -0.30% | 8.38% | 2.86% | 8.57% | -25.10% | -0.92% | 14.69% | 15.16% | 3.50% | 13.55% |
VGM Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals | -0.88% | 11.03% | 8.77% | 2.99% | -24.15% | 10.88% | 7.97% | 17.59% | -7.86% | 9.51% |
Fundamentals
GBAB:
$394.81M
VGM:
$547.20M
GBAB:
$2.69
VGM:
$0.41
GBAB:
5.39
VGM:
24.66
GBAB:
0.48
VGM:
0.12
GBAB:
10.02
VGM:
7.74
GBAB:
0.95
VGM:
1.01
GBAB:
$39.21M
VGM:
$70.66M
GBAB:
$20.27M
VGM:
$37.16M
GBAB:
$108.83M
VGM:
$10.31M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBAB achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly higher than VGM's -0.88% return. Over the past 10 years, GBAB has outperformed VGM with an annualized return of 3.13%, while VGM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.34% annualized return.
GBAB
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- -0.30%
- 6M
- -2.72%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.94%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
VGM
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 8.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.20%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBAB vs. VGM — Risk / Return Rank
GBAB
VGM
GBAB vs. VGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) and Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals (VGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBAB | VGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | 0.82 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.41 | 1.17 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.17 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 1.13 | -0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 3.25 | -2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBAB | VGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 0.82 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | -0.00 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.19 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.29 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between GBAB and VGM is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GBAB vs. VGM - Dividend Comparison
GBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, more than VGM's 7.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBAB Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust | 10.40% | 10.11% | 9.93% | 9.32% | 9.22% | 6.36% | 5.92% | 6.37% | 6.88% | 6.64% | 7.51% | 7.78% |
VGM Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals | 7.68% | 7.48% | 6.35% | 4.42% | 5.67% | 4.65% | 4.65% | 4.82% | 5.97% | 5.79% | 6.50% | 6.62% |
Drawdowns
GBAB vs. VGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBAB drawdown since its inception was -35.81%, smaller than the maximum VGM drawdown of -49.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBAB and VGM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBAB | VGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.81% | -49.40% | +13.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.80% | -8.42% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.81% | -36.61% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.81% | -36.61% | +0.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.69% | -7.57% | -6.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -9.00% | +0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.92% | -0.32% |
Volatility
GBAB vs. VGM - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals (VGM) at 5.53%. This indicates that GBAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GBAB | VGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 5.53% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 7.23% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.91% | 10.52% | +2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 11.29% | +3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 12.32% | +2.75% |
Financials
GBAB vs. VGM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust and Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities