GBAB vs. TEAF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) and Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF).

Performance

GBAB vs. TEAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) and Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GBAB vs. TEAF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GBAB Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust	-0.37%	8.38%	2.86%	8.57%	-25.10%	-0.92%	14.69%	8.86%
TEAF Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund	0.00%	9.74%	12.16%	-0.64%	-5.41%	19.37%	-12.76%	-13.82%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) GBAB : $39.21M TEAF : $21.36M
Gross Profit (TTM) GBAB : $20.27M TEAF : $14.31M
EBITDA (TTM) GBAB : $108.83M TEAF : -$435.19K

Returns By Period

GBAB

• 1D: 3.65%
• 1M: -5.48%
• YTD: -0.37%
• 6M: -2.22%
• 1Y: 3.00%
• 3Y*: 4.24%
• 5Y*: -0.96%
• 10Y*: 3.12%

TEAF

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GBAB vs. TEAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBAB

GBAB Risk / Return Rank: 48
GBAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
GBAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
GBAB Omega Ratio Rank: 40
GBAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
GBAB Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBAB vs. TEAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) and Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GBAB	TEAF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.43	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.47	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GBAB	TEAF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between GBAB and TEAF is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GBAB vs. TEAF - Dividend Comparison

GBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.41%, more than TEAF's 5.16% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GBAB Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust	10.41%	10.11%	9.93%	9.32%	9.22%	6.36%	5.92%	6.37%	6.88%	6.64%	7.51%	7.78%
TEAF Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund	5.16%	7.37%	9.00%	9.22%	8.25%	6.18%	8.17%	5.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GBAB	TEAF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.75%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.22%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GBAB	TEAF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.38%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.93%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.56%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.07%	—	—

Financials