PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GBAB vs. FKUTX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GBABFKUTX
YTD Return6.45%29.67%
1Y Return13.07%29.61%
3Y Return (Ann)-4.30%7.15%
5Y Return (Ann)0.05%5.05%
10Y Return (Ann)4.37%6.06%
Sharpe Ratio0.981.89
Sortino Ratio1.542.45
Omega Ratio1.171.35
Calmar Ratio0.491.38
Martin Ratio2.846.50
Ulcer Index4.59%4.51%
Daily Std Dev13.32%15.54%
Max Drawdown-35.81%-44.54%
Current Drawdown-17.33%-2.03%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between GBAB and FKUTX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GBAB vs. FKUTX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GBAB achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than FKUTX's 29.67% return. Over the past 10 years, GBAB has underperformed FKUTX with an annualized return of 4.37%, while FKUTX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.26%
12.94%
GBAB
FKUTX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GBAB vs. FKUTX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) and Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBAB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GBAB, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.98
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GBAB, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.54
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GBAB, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GBAB, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.49
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GBAB, currently valued at 2.84, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.84
FKUTX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FKUTX, currently valued at 1.91, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.91
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FKUTX, currently valued at 2.47, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.47
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FKUTX, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FKUTX, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FKUTX, currently valued at 6.56, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.56

GBAB vs. FKUTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the FKUTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBAB and FKUTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.98
1.91
GBAB
FKUTX

Dividends

GBAB vs. FKUTX - Dividend Comparison

GBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, more than FKUTX's 2.06% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GBAB
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
9.46%9.34%9.24%6.37%5.93%6.39%6.89%6.65%7.51%7.77%7.47%8.31%
FKUTX
Franklin Utilities Fund
2.06%2.63%2.29%2.24%2.73%2.38%2.84%2.84%2.70%3.24%2.68%3.27%

Drawdowns

GBAB vs. FKUTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBAB drawdown since its inception was -35.81%, smaller than the maximum FKUTX drawdown of -44.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBAB and FKUTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-17.33%
-2.03%
GBAB
FKUTX

Volatility

GBAB vs. FKUTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) is 3.44%, while Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that GBAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKUTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.44%
4.95%
GBAB
FKUTX