PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBAB vs. BOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBAB vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBAB achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than BOXX's 1.70% return.


GBAB

1D
0.00%
1M
2.27%
YTD
-0.59%
6M
-1.45%
1Y
4.98%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
-2.31%
10Y*
2.94%

BOXX

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.16%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.82%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBAB vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GBAB
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
-0.59%8.38%2.86%8.57%5.48%
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
1.70%4.37%5.16%5.04%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GBAB and BOXX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2022

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBAB vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBAB
GBAB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
GBAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBAB Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GBAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBAB Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBAB vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBABBOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-11.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-34.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

8.71

-7.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

58.08

-57.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.42

496.82

-495.40

GBAB vs. BOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the BOXX Sharpe Ratio of 12.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBAB and BOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBAB vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBAB drawdown since its inception was -35.81%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBAB and BOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBABBOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.81%

-0.12%

-35.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

-0.07%

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-0.12%

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.94%

-0.02%

-13.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-0.00%

-8.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

0.01%

+3.50%

Volatility

GBAB vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) has a higher volatility of 1.57% compared to Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) at 0.12%. This indicates that GBAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBABBOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

0.12%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

0.26%

+8.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

0.32%

+10.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.63%

0.37%

+14.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.96%

0.37%

+14.59%

Dividends

GBAB vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison

GBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.71%, while BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GBAB
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
10.71%10.11%9.93%9.32%9.22%6.36%5.92%6.37%6.88%6.64%7.51%7.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBAB and BOXX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GBAB has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to BOXX (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBAB dropped -35.81% vs BOXX's -0.12%.

BOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.43 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBAB and BOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer