PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBAB vs. BAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GBAB vs. BAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) and Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GBAB vs. BAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBAB
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
-0.37%8.38%2.86%8.57%-25.10%-0.92%14.69%15.16%3.50%13.55%
BAB
Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF
0.13%8.30%1.03%8.67%-19.50%1.00%9.11%10.85%0.93%9.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBAB achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than BAB's 0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, GBAB has outperformed BAB with an annualized return of 3.12%, while BAB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.59% annualized return.


GBAB

1D
3.65%
1M
-5.48%
YTD
-0.37%
6M
-2.22%
1Y
3.00%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
-0.96%
10Y*
3.12%

BAB

1D
0.97%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.79%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
2.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBAB vs. BAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBAB
GBAB Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GBAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBAB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GBAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBAB Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BAB
BAB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAB Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBAB vs. BAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) and Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBABBABDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.23

0.79

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.40

1.17

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.14

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

1.27

-0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.47

3.79

-2.31

GBAB vs. BAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the BAB Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBAB and BAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBABBABDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

0.79

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.00

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.27

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.52

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between GBAB and BAB is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GBAB vs. BAB - Dividend Comparison

GBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.41%, more than BAB's 4.03% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBAB
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
10.41%10.11%9.93%9.32%9.22%6.36%5.92%6.37%6.88%6.64%7.51%7.78%
BAB
Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF
4.03%3.96%3.97%3.65%3.40%2.63%2.96%3.77%4.20%3.96%4.26%4.71%

Drawdowns

GBAB vs. BAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBAB drawdown since its inception was -35.81%, which is greater than BAB's maximum drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBAB and BAB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GBABBABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.81%

-27.80%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-4.50%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.81%

-24.95%

-10.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.81%

-27.80%

-8.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.75%

-5.64%

-8.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-5.30%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

1.50%

+1.08%

Volatility

GBAB vs. BAB - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB) at 2.16%. This indicates that GBAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GBABBABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

2.16%

+3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.38%

3.90%

+4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.93%

6.62%

+6.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

8.31%

+6.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.07%

9.70%

+5.37%