GAU vs. NGD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Galiano Gold Inc. (GAU) and New Gold Inc. (NGD).

Performance

GAU vs. NGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Galiano Gold Inc. (GAU) and New Gold Inc. (NGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GAU vs. NGD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GAU Galiano Gold Inc.	-0.79%	105.69%	30.86%	80.75%	-25.69%	-38.07%	18.95%	48.76%	-9.56%	-76.92%
NGD New Gold Inc.	4.25%	251.21%	69.86%	48.98%	-34.67%	-31.51%	148.86%	16.28%	-77.00%	-6.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GAU : $652.06M NGD : $7.24B
EPS GAU : -$0.11 NGD : $0.31
PS Ratio GAU : 1.99 NGD : 5.89
PB Ratio GAU : 2.98 NGD : 5.85
Total Revenue (TTM) GAU : $328.44M NGD : $1.23B
Gross Profit (TTM) GAU : $86.01M NGD : $508.36M
EBITDA (TTM) GAU : $26.60M NGD : $589.77M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAU achieves a -0.79% return, which is significantly lower than NGD's 4.25% return. Over the past 10 years, GAU has underperformed NGD with an annualized return of 1.01%, while NGD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.02% annualized return.

GAU

• 1D: 9.13%
• 1M: -28.69%
• YTD: -0.79%
• 6M: 14.61%
• 1Y: 102.42%
• 3Y*: 62.65%
• 5Y*: 16.29%
• 10Y*: 1.01%

NGD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -32.34%
• YTD: 4.25%
• 6M: 26.46%
• 1Y: 144.74%
• 3Y*: 114.42%
• 5Y*: 38.53%
• 10Y*: 9.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GAU vs. NGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAU

GAU Risk / Return Rank: 80
GAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
GAU Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
GAU Martin Ratio Rank: 82

NGD

NGD Risk / Return Rank: 94
NGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
NGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
NGD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
NGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
NGD Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAU vs. NGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galiano Gold Inc. (GAU) and New Gold Inc. (NGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GAU	NGD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	2.74	-1.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	2.86	-0.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.41	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	5.21	-2.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.55	19.02	-12.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GAU vs. NGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the NGD Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAU and NGD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GAU	NGD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	2.74	-1.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.62	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02	0.14	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.03	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between GAU and NGD is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GAU vs. NGD - Dividend Comparison

Neither GAU nor NGD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GAU vs. NGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAU drawdown since its inception was -96.20%, roughly equal to the maximum NGD drawdown of -96.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAU and NGD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAU	NGD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.20%	-96.73%	+0.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.94%	-32.34%	-6.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.10%	-71.98%	-2.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-92.21%	-92.26%	+0.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.50%	-35.37%	-38.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-71.25%	-62.74%	-8.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.88%	8.87%	+7.01%

Volatility

GAU vs. NGD - Volatility Comparison

Galiano Gold Inc. (GAU) has a higher volatility of 22.63% compared to New Gold Inc. (NGD) at 20.12%. This indicates that GAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAU	NGD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.63%	20.12%	+2.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.35%	50.95%	+5.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	79.63%	63.46%	+16.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.29%	62.32%	-0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.90%	65.34%	+0.56%

Financials