GATO.TO vs. LUG.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Gatos Silver, Inc. (GATO.TO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GATO.TO or LUG.TO.
Key characteristics
GATO.TO | LUG.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 163.88% | 85.29% |
1Y Return | 206.20% | 101.84% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 9.89% | 38.86% |
Sharpe Ratio | 3.47 | 2.66 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.84 | 3.16 |
Omega Ratio | 1.46 | 1.40 |
Calmar Ratio | 3.15 | 1.66 |
Martin Ratio | 23.25 | 18.52 |
Ulcer Index | 9.39% | 5.34% |
Daily Std Dev | 62.93% | 37.13% |
Max Drawdown | -87.36% | -97.92% |
Current Drawdown | -18.42% | -14.53% |
Fundamentals
GATO.TO | LUG.TO | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | CA$1.53B | CA$7.40B |
EPS | CA$0.54 | CA$1.76 |
PE Ratio | 40.91 | 17.31 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$0.00 | CA$718.86M |
Gross Profit (TTM) | -CA$12.00K | CA$363.05M |
EBITDA (TTM) | CA$44.78M | CA$389.06M |
Correlation
The correlation between GATO.TO and LUG.TO is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GATO.TO vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GATO.TO achieves a 163.88% return, which is significantly higher than LUG.TO's 85.29% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GATO.TO vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gatos Silver, Inc. (GATO.TO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GATO.TO vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison
GATO.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | |
---|---|---|---|
Gatos Silver, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Lundin Gold Inc. | 2.27% | 3.27% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
GATO.TO vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GATO.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.36%, smaller than the maximum LUG.TO drawdown of -97.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GATO.TO and LUG.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GATO.TO vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Gatos Silver, Inc. (GATO.TO) has a higher volatility of 22.63% compared to Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) at 11.97%. This indicates that GATO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GATO.TO vs. LUG.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gatos Silver, Inc. and Lundin Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities