PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAM vs. JAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAM vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General American Investors Company, Inc. (GAM) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAM achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than JAAA's 2.09% return.


GAM

1D
-0.83%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
8.00%
6M
8.32%
1Y
30.60%
3Y*
26.76%
5Y*
14.89%
10Y*
15.87%

JAAA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.31%
YTD
2.09%
6M
2.37%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAM vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GAM
General American Investors Company, Inc.
8.00%28.63%29.55%26.84%-14.84%20.56%14.07%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
2.09%5.16%7.43%8.59%0.49%1.39%0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between GAM and JAAA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2020

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAM vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAM
GAM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAM Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

JAAA
JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAM vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General American Investors Company, Inc. (GAM) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GAMJAAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

2.79

-1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

13.24

-9.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.71

71.33

-54.62

GAM vs. JAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAM Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is lower than the JAAA Sharpe Ratio of 6.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAM and JAAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GAM vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAM drawdown since its inception was -66.63%, which is greater than JAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAM and JAAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAMJAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.63%

-2.64%

-63.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-0.39%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.90%

-1.46%

-13.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.09%

-2.64%

-23.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

0.00%

-2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.56%

-0.25%

-11.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

0.07%

+1.77%

Volatility

GAM vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison

General American Investors Company, Inc. (GAM) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.12%. This indicates that GAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAMJAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

0.12%

+3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

0.64%

+8.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

0.83%

+10.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

1.67%

+14.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

1.64%

+16.00%

Dividends

GAM vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison

GAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.09%, more than JAAA's 4.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAM
General American Investors Company, Inc.
10.09%11.32%8.82%6.17%4.15%1.38%6.72%6.49%9.67%9.56%10.20%3.60%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
4.99%5.30%6.35%6.11%2.74%1.21%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAM and JAAA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAM has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to JAAA (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAM dropped -66.63% vs JAAA's -2.64%.

JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.19 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAM and JAAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer