GAL vs. VDC
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC).
GAL and VDC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GAL is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Apr 25, 2012. VDC is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Performance
GAL vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GAL vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF | 0.38% | 15.95% | 9.85% | 13.32% | -13.41% | 12.23% | 9.33% | 19.59% | -7.71% | 18.67% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 6.90% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 26.11% | -7.79% | 11.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAL achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 6.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GAL having a 7.52% annualized return and VDC not far ahead at 7.72%.
GAL
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -4.19%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
VDC
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- YTD
- 6.90%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- 7.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 7.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GAL vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GAL vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank
GAL
VDC
GAL vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAL | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 0.36 | +0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 0.62 | +1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.08 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 0.71 | +1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 1.76 | +6.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAL | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.36 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.57 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.53 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.67 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between GAL and VDC is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GAL vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
GAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than VDC's 2.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF | 3.38% | 3.47% | 2.99% | 2.56% | 6.19% | 4.05% | 2.14% | 2.96% | 2.43% | 2.26% | 2.43% | 3.10% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.15% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Drawdowns
GAL vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAL drawdown since its inception was -28.31%, smaller than the maximum VDC drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAL and VDC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAL | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.31% | -34.24% | +5.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.02% | -9.28% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | -16.55% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.31% | -25.31% | -3.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -7.52% | +3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -3.71% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 3.73% | -2.00% |
Volatility
GAL vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 3.89%. This indicates that GAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GAL | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 3.89% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 8.98% | -2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.92% | 13.75% | -2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.41% | 12.98% | -2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.32% | 14.59% | -3.27% |