GAL vs. QYLG
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG).
GAL and QYLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GAL is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Apr 25, 2012. QYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. It was launched on Sep 18, 2020.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GAL or QYLG.
Key characteristics
GAL | QYLG | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 11.25% | 21.45% |
1Y Return | 20.73% | 29.19% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 2.82% | 9.32% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.33 | 2.17 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.39 | 2.89 |
Omega Ratio | 1.43 | 1.42 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.93 | 2.75 |
Martin Ratio | 15.98 | 12.87 |
Ulcer Index | 1.26% | 2.28% |
Daily Std Dev | 8.68% | 13.55% |
Max Drawdown | -28.31% | -30.12% |
Current Drawdown | -1.12% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAL and QYLG is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GAL vs. QYLG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GAL achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly lower than QYLG's 21.45% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GAL vs. QYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLG's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GAL vs. QYLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GAL vs. QYLG - Dividend Comparison
GAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than QYLG's 5.69% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF | 2.21% | 2.56% | 6.19% | 4.05% | 2.14% | 2.96% | 2.43% | 2.26% | 2.43% | 3.10% | 3.36% | 2.50% |
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 5.69% | 5.43% | 6.90% | 15.19% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GAL vs. QYLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAL drawdown since its inception was -28.31%, smaller than the maximum QYLG drawdown of -30.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAL and QYLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GAL vs. QYLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) is 2.36%, while Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that GAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.