PortfoliosLab logo
GAIN vs. EFC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GAIN and EFC is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GAIN vs. EFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GAIN:

0.62

EFC:

1.16

Sortino Ratio

GAIN:

1.03

EFC:

1.91

Omega Ratio

GAIN:

1.13

EFC:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

GAIN:

0.97

EFC:

1.48

Martin Ratio

GAIN:

3.14

EFC:

5.03

Ulcer Index

GAIN:

4.57%

EFC:

5.53%

Daily Std Dev

GAIN:

23.90%

EFC:

21.28%

Max Drawdown

GAIN:

-80.88%

EFC:

-79.08%

Current Drawdown

GAIN:

0.00%

EFC:

-5.61%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GAIN:

$526.77M

EFC:

$1.23B

EPS

GAIN:

$1.91

EFC:

$1.39

PE Ratio

GAIN:

7.49

EFC:

9.37

PEG Ratio

GAIN:

5.46

EFC:

0.86

PS Ratio

GAIN:

5.91

EFC:

3.99

PB Ratio

GAIN:

1.06

EFC:

0.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

GAIN:

$78.86M

EFC:

$284.66M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GAIN:

$78.15M

EFC:

$212.38M

EBITDA (TTM)

GAIN:

$64.91M

EFC:

$216.47M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAIN achieves a 11.97% return, which is significantly lower than EFC's 14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, GAIN has outperformed EFC with an annualized return of 17.92%, while EFC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.


GAIN

YTD

11.97%

1M

6.32%

6M

9.84%

1Y

14.81%

5Y*

19.47%

10Y*

17.92%

EFC

YTD

14.03%

1M

10.93%

6M

15.91%

1Y

24.45%

5Y*

19.99%

10Y*

7.60%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GAIN vs. EFC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAIN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GAIN is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GAIN is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GAIN is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GAIN is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GAIN is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GAIN is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

EFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFC is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFC is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFC is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFC is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFC is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFC is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GAIN vs. EFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GAIN Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the EFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAIN and EFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GAIN vs. EFC - Dividend Comparison

GAIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.46%, less than EFC's 11.75% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corporation
11.46%12.53%17.24%9.88%6.06%9.22%7.74%9.88%7.94%8.87%9.68%11.00%
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
11.75%13.20%14.16%14.55%9.60%8.49%9.87%10.70%12.13%12.56%14.60%15.43%

Drawdowns

GAIN vs. EFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAIN drawdown since its inception was -80.88%, roughly equal to the maximum EFC drawdown of -79.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAIN and EFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GAIN vs. EFC - Volatility Comparison

Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) at 5.43%. This indicates that GAIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GAIN vs. EFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Investment Corporation and Ellington Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M20212022202320242025
35.69M
72.28M
(GAIN) Total Revenue
(EFC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items