PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAFYX vs. QDSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAFYX vs. QDSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaSimplex Global Alternatives Fund (GAFYX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund - Class I (QDSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAFYX achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than QDSIX's 5.50% return.


GAFYX

1D
1.04%
1M
1.77%
6M
6.64%
YTD
10.26%
1Y
15.27%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
4.79%
ALL TIME*
3.76%

QDSIX

1D
0.61%
1M
2.21%
6M
3.50%
YTD
5.50%
1Y
13.88%
3Y*
12.16%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GAFYX vs. QDSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GAFYX
AlphaSimplex Global Alternatives Fund
10.26%6.68%9.66%3.77%-0.49%1.29%6.10%
QDSIX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund - Class I
5.50%16.36%9.71%8.88%14.69%10.64%5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GAFYX and QDSIX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020

0.36

Over the past year, GAFYX and QDSIX have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAFYX vs. QDSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GAFYX
GAFYX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GAFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GAFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

QDSIX
QDSIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
QDSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QDSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GAFYX vs. QDSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaSimplex Global Alternatives Fund (GAFYX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund - Class I (QDSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GAFYXQDSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.45

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

4.21

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.31

13.94

-3.63

GAFYX vs. QDSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAFYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the QDSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAFYX and QDSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GAFYX vs. QDSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAFYX drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, which is greater than QDSIX's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAFYX and QDSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAFYXQDSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.49%

-7.06%

-12.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-3.08%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.74%

-6.90%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.74%

-7.06%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.94%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-1.44%

-3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

0.93%

+0.43%

Volatility

GAFYX vs. QDSIX - Volatility Comparison

AlphaSimplex Global Alternatives Fund (GAFYX) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund - Class I (QDSIX) at 1.81%. This indicates that GAFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAFYXQDSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

1.81%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

3.94%

+3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.79%

5.36%

+3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.40%

7.63%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.92%

7.30%

-0.38%

GAFYX vs. QDSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAFYX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than QDSIX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAFYX vs. QDSIX - Dividend Comparison

GAFYX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAFYX
AlphaSimplex Global Alternatives Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%5.24%9.57%0.00%2.57%1.16%1.37%0.74%0.00%3.53%
QDSIX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund - Class I
2.12%2.23%0.00%11.35%8.22%6.07%1.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAFYX and QDSIX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAFYX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to QDSIX (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAFYX dropped -19.49% vs QDSIX's -7.06%.

QDSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAFYX and QDSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer