GABAX vs. DGRO
Compare and contrast key facts about Gabelli Asset Fund (GABAX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO).
GABAX is managed by Gabelli. It was launched on Mar 3, 1986. DGRO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GABAX or DGRO.
Correlation
The correlation between GABAX and DGRO is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GABAX vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GABAX:
-0.30
DGRO:
0.75
GABAX:
-0.24
DGRO:
1.13
GABAX:
0.96
DGRO:
1.16
GABAX:
-0.16
DGRO:
0.79
GABAX:
-0.60
DGRO:
3.27
GABAX:
10.46%
DGRO:
3.41%
GABAX:
21.02%
DGRO:
14.85%
GABAX:
-58.01%
DGRO:
-35.10%
GABAX:
-31.15%
DGRO:
-5.35%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GABAX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's -0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, GABAX has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of -3.23%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.32% annualized return.
GABAX
1.60%
9.60%
-11.90%
-7.21%
0.80%
-3.23%
DGRO
-0.40%
7.73%
-0.79%
10.07%
14.03%
11.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GABAX vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GABAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GABAX vs. DGRO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GABAX
DGRO
GABAX vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Asset Fund (GABAX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GABAX vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
GABAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than DGRO's 2.28% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABAX Gabelli Asset Fund | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.33% | 0.18% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.42% | 0.35% | 0.15% | 0.78% | 0.40% | 0.27% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 2.28% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% | 0.97% |
Drawdowns
GABAX vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GABAX drawdown since its inception was -58.01%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABAX and DGRO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GABAX vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Gabelli Asset Fund (GABAX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) have volatilities of 10.98% and 11.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with GABAX or DGRO
Recent discussions
Dividend reinvestment
Ed
Filtering portfolio screening columns
Bee Zee
calculation of performance
Portfolio performance graph for past 1Y (thru 3/13/2025):
GLD=37.82%
IAU=37.97%
IAUM=38.34%
using daily adjusted closing market price (from NASDAQ) integrating the logarithmic daily rate of return between 3/13/2025 to 3/14/2025 to calculate the cumulative rate of return, I calculate
GLD=31.34%
IAU=31.45%
IAUM=31.66%
These ETF's do not pay a dividend, Expense cost is included in the closing price.
The difference in rate of return is about 6%, which is too large. I can send you my calculation (xls) if this would be useful.
What is causing the error?
Marcus Crahan