GABAX vs. CRF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GABAX (Gabelli Asset Fund) and CRF (Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.) are both mutual funds - GABAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Gabelli, while CRF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Cornerstone. Over the past 10 years, GABAX returned 10.22%/yr vs 11.29%/yr for CRF. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GABAX charges 1.33%/yr vs 1.84%/yr for CRF.

Performance

GABAX vs. CRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Asset Fund (GABAX) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABAX achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly higher than CRF's -3.76% return. Over the past 10 years, GABAX has underperformed CRF with an annualized return of 10.22%, while CRF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.29% annualized return.

GABAX

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 3.09%
• YTD: 9.38%
• 6M: 8.07%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: 13.53%
• 5Y*: 7.31%
• 10Y*: 10.22%

CRF

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -1.42%
• YTD: -3.76%
• 6M: -3.15%
• 1Y: 11.98%
• 3Y*: 15.66%
• 5Y*: 9.26%
• 10Y*: 11.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GABAX vs. CRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GABAX Gabelli Asset Fund	9.38%	16.65%	8.07%	10.32%	-10.74%	18.96%	11.22%	22.44%	-7.61%	20.17%
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	-3.76%	12.46%	44.39%	19.49%	-36.70%	39.73%	28.13%	21.74%	-11.74%	21.35%

Correlation

The correlation between GABAX and CRF is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987	0.26

Over the past year, GABAX and CRF have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

GABAX vs. CRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GABAX

GABAX Risk / Return Rank: 41
GABAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
GABAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
GABAX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
GABAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
GABAX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

CRF

CRF Risk / Return Rank: 10
CRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
CRF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
CRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CRF Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GABAX vs. CRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Asset Fund (GABAX) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GABAX	CRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	0.78	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	1.17	+1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.16	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	0.81	+1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.21	2.65	+5.56

GABAX vs. CRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the CRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABAX and CRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GABAX vs. CRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABAX drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, smaller than the maximum CRF drawdown of -80.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABAX and CRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GABAX	CRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.44%	-80.70%	+25.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.47%	-14.88%	+4.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.11%	-29.66%	+14.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.90%	-43.12%	+21.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.65%	-45.90%	+9.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-5.53%	+5.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.55%	-22.29%	+16.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	4.53%	-1.79%

Volatility

GABAX vs. CRF - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Asset Fund (GABAX) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) at 3.39%. This indicates that GABAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GABAX	CRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	3.39%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.23%	13.53%	-3.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.77%	15.48%	-2.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.99%	25.08%	-10.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.53%	25.87%	-9.34%

GABAX vs. CRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CRF's 1.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

GABAX vs. CRF - Dividend Comparison

GABAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.24%, less than CRF's 20.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	20.06%	17.38%	14.32%	19.94%	29.31%	13.41%	18.91%	21.67%	24.85%	17.96%	24.08%	23.58%
GABAX Gabelli Asset Fund	11.24%	12.29%	15.41%	8.04%	10.06%	9.78%	13.12%	10.04%	10.01%	8.69%	13.23%	13.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GABAX and CRF in my portfolio?

GABAX and CRF have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GABAX or CRF?

GABAX has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to CRF (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABAX dropped -55.44% vs CRF's -80.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GABAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.