PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAHX vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAHX vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAHX achieves a 15.79% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 14.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAHX has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 22.45%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.07% annualized return.


FZAHX

1D
-0.96%
1M
7.22%
YTD
15.79%
6M
16.23%
1Y
38.81%
3Y*
31.78%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
22.45%

AAPL

1D
0.31%
1M
9.62%
YTD
14.69%
6M
11.08%
1Y
54.06%
3Y*
20.68%
5Y*
20.46%
10Y*
30.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAHX vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZAHX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z
15.79%22.61%39.23%45.70%-38.18%11.74%69.25%40.80%15.25%35.10%
AAPL
Apple Inc
14.69%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAHX and AAPL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between FZAHX and AAPL has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAHX vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAHX
FZAHX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FZAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAHX vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZAHXAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.44

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.94

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.33

9.91

-0.58

FZAHX vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAHX and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZAHXAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.44

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.75

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

1.04

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.44

+0.43

Drawdowns

FZAHX vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAHX drawdown since its inception was -44.45%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAHX and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAHXAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.45%

-81.80%

+37.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.06%

-13.80%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.58%

-33.36%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.45%

-33.36%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.45%

-38.52%

-5.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-1.26%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-29.61%

+21.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

5.47%

-1.19%

Volatility

FZAHX vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) is 4.69%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that FZAHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAHXAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

5.01%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

15.88%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

22.31%

-4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.84%

27.45%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.89%

28.89%

-5.00%

Dividends

FZAHX vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

FZAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
FZAHX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z
3.12%3.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.45%5.15%3.74%11.00%7.50%14.42%10.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZAHX and AAPL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPL has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to FZAHX (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAHX dropped -44.45% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAHX and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer