PortfoliosLab logo
FYC vs. FNCMX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FYC and FNCMX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FYC vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
264.54%
583.43%
FYC
FNCMX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FYC:

0.43

FNCMX:

0.42

Sortino Ratio

FYC:

0.75

FNCMX:

0.74

Omega Ratio

FYC:

1.09

FNCMX:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

FYC:

0.37

FNCMX:

0.43

Martin Ratio

FYC:

1.11

FNCMX:

1.42

Ulcer Index

FYC:

9.26%

FNCMX:

7.28%

Daily Std Dev

FYC:

24.85%

FNCMX:

25.61%

Max Drawdown

FYC:

-47.85%

FNCMX:

-55.71%

Current Drawdown

FYC:

-14.96%

FNCMX:

-11.00%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FYC having a -7.21% return and FNCMX slightly higher at -7.02%. Over the past 10 years, FYC has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 9.24%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.09% annualized return.


FYC

YTD

-7.21%

1M

17.77%

6M

-11.40%

1Y

10.58%

5Y*

13.89%

10Y*

9.24%

FNCMX

YTD

-7.02%

1M

17.41%

6M

-6.72%

1Y

10.63%

5Y*

15.48%

10Y*

14.09%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FYC vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FYC vs. FNCMX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FYC is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FYC is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FYC is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FYC is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FYC is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FYC is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FNCMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNCMX is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FYC vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FYC Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is comparable to the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYC and FNCMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.43
0.42
FYC
FNCMX

Dividends

FYC vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

FYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than FNCMX's 0.65% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.78%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.11%0.31%0.22%0.03%
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
0.65%0.61%0.67%0.88%0.47%0.67%0.97%0.94%0.70%0.91%0.89%0.80%

Drawdowns

FYC vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYC drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, smaller than the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYC and FNCMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-14.96%
-11.00%
FYC
FNCMX

Volatility

FYC vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) is 10.65%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) has a volatility of 14.10%. This indicates that FYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10.65%
14.10%
FYC
FNCMX