PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYC vs. DWAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYC vs. DWAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FYC having a 25.16% return and DWAS slightly lower at 24.87%. Over the past 10 years, FYC has outperformed DWAS with an annualized return of 15.10%, while DWAS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.88% annualized return.


FYC

1D
-0.75%
1M
5.13%
YTD
25.16%
6M
22.15%
1Y
56.72%
3Y*
28.14%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
15.10%

DWAS

1D
-1.80%
1M
6.39%
YTD
24.87%
6M
21.56%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
13.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYC vs. DWAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
25.16%24.24%23.99%14.52%-25.86%21.64%32.34%16.79%-5.54%22.97%
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
24.87%6.09%9.81%16.88%-18.51%19.75%32.32%31.39%-10.68%20.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FYC and DWAS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2012

0.93

The correlation between FYC and DWAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYC vs. DWAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FYC
DWAS

Healthcare

25.3%
25.9%

Industrials

18.7%
18.0%

Technology

17.5%
20.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
5.9%

Financial Services

8.9%
13.3%

Real Estate

5.7%
1.2%

Communication Services

3.7%
1.1%

Basic Materials

3.7%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
3.0%

Energy

2.2%
6.5%

Utilities

1.6%
0.3%

Healthcare

FYC
25.3%
DWAS
25.9%

Industrials

FYC
18.7%
DWAS
18.0%

Technology

FYC
17.5%
DWAS
20.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FYC
9.5%
DWAS
5.9%

Financial Services

FYC
8.9%
DWAS
13.3%

Real Estate

FYC
5.7%
DWAS
1.2%

Communication Services

FYC
3.7%
DWAS
1.1%

Basic Materials

FYC
3.7%
DWAS
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

FYC
3.2%
DWAS
3.0%

Energy

FYC
2.2%
DWAS
6.5%

Utilities

FYC
1.6%
DWAS
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYC vs. DWAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYC
FYC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAS
DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYC vs. DWAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FYCDWASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.44

4.51

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.70

14.54

+5.16

FYC vs. DWAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYC Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the DWAS Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYC and DWAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FYC vs. DWAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYC drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, roughly equal to the maximum DWAS drawdown of -46.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYC and DWAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYCDWASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.85%

-46.16%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-10.02%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.79%

-33.83%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.37%

-33.83%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.85%

-46.16%

-1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-1.80%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-10.27%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.10%

-0.21%

Volatility

FYC vs. DWAS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) is 7.00%, while Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that FYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYCDWASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

8.88%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.77%

18.12%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.65%

23.99%

-2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.73%

25.86%

-2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.61%

26.69%

-2.08%

FYC vs. DWAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than DWAS's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYC vs. DWAS - Dividend Comparison

FYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while DWAS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.00%0.07%0.79%1.42%0.81%0.16%0.21%0.13%0.04%0.20%0.52%0.19%
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.06%0.08%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.10%0.31%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FYC and DWAS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DWAS has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to FYC (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYC dropped -47.85% vs DWAS's -46.16%.

On 10-year performance, FYC leads with 15.10% vs 13.88% for DWAS. On fees, DWAS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FYC has been the lower-risk option at 7.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYC has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 13.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DWAS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.

FYC has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for DWAS.

FYC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while DWAS is Momentum. FYC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index, while DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for FYC and 0.60% for DWAS.

FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYC and DWAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer