PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXR vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXR achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FXR has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.70%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


FXR

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.16%
YTD
8.45%
6M
10.07%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
12.70%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
8.45%7.56%16.19%26.98%-16.68%25.07%12.82%33.42%-15.12%24.20%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FXR and VOO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.84

The correlation between FXR and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXR vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXR
VOO

Industrials

70.5%
8.3%

Technology

10.3%
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
10.2%

Basic Materials

6.2%
1.8%

Financial Services

3.4%
11.6%

Healthcare

0.7%
8.5%

Utilities

0.7%
2.4%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Industrials

FXR
70.5%
VOO
8.3%

Technology

FXR
10.3%
VOO
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FXR
7.5%
VOO
10.2%

Basic Materials

FXR
6.2%
VOO
1.8%

Financial Services

FXR
3.4%
VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

FXR
0.7%
VOO
8.5%

Utilities

FXR
0.7%
VOO
2.4%

Communication Services

FXR

-

VOO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

FXR

-

VOO
4.9%

Energy

FXR

-

VOO
3.5%

Real Estate

FXR

-

VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXR
FXR Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXR Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXR Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXRVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.43

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

3.16

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.82

14.73

-9.91

FXR vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXR Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXR and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXRVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.39

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.83

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.87

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.89

-0.52

Drawdowns

FXR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXR drawdown since its inception was -63.81%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXR and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXRVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.81%

-33.99%

-29.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.66%

-8.90%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.65%

-18.69%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

-24.52%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.71%

-33.99%

-10.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.35%

-0.70%

-4.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.35%

-3.69%

-6.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

1.91%

+2.36%

Volatility

FXR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that FXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXRVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

2.84%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.61%

8.90%

+5.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.98%

11.80%

+7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.57%

16.81%

+3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.92%

18.01%

+3.91%

FXR vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXR has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
0.63%0.71%0.72%0.77%0.92%0.52%1.06%0.74%1.18%0.55%0.52%0.62%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXR and VOO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXR has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXR dropped -63.81% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 12.70% for FXR. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXR.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.63% for FXR.

FXR is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FXR tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXR and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXR and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer