FWRLX vs. VOOG

In the year-to-date period, FWRLX achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly lower than VOOG's -0.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FWRLX has underperformed VOOG with an annualized return of 3.87%, while VOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.54% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FWRLX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.10% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FWRLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWRLX and VOOG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FWRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than VOOG's 0.56% yield.

The maximum FWRLX drawdown since its inception was -79.37%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRLX and VOOG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) have volatilities of 7.37% and 7.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.