FWRLX vs. VOOG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG).
FWRLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 20, 2000. VOOG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Growth Index. It was launched on Apr 5, 2019.
Performance
FWRLX vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FWRLX vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRLX Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio | 6.05% | 2.20% | 17.12% | 25.97% | -27.86% | 12.15% | 33.39% | 40.17% | -6.37% | 24.87% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | -6.97% | 22.11% | 35.89% | 29.96% | -29.48% | 31.95% | 33.35% | 30.93% | -0.21% | 27.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWRLX achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly higher than VOOG's -6.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FWRLX has underperformed VOOG with an annualized return of 11.70%, while VOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.86% annualized return.
FWRLX
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 6.05%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 7.18%
- 3Y*
- 12.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
VOOG
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- YTD
- -6.97%
- 6M
- -5.29%
- 1Y
- 23.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- 15.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FWRLX vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWRLX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FWRLX vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank
FWRLX
VOOG
FWRLX vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FWRLX | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 1.05 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.69 | 1.62 | -0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.23 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 1.76 | -1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 6.81 | -4.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FWRLX | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 1.05 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.59 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.77 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.84 | -0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between FWRLX and VOOG is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FWRLX vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison
FWRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, more than VOOG's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRLX Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio | 6.21% | 6.59% | 9.06% | 2.38% | 9.26% | 7.53% | 6.95% | 2.74% | 16.03% | 3.57% | 6.57% | 7.21% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.53% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 1.12% | 0.93% | 0.53% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.34% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.56% |
Drawdowns
FWRLX vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWRLX drawdown since its inception was -79.37%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRLX and VOOG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWRLX | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.37% | -32.73% | -46.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.37% | -13.71% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -32.73% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.01% | -32.73% | +0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -9.07% | +6.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.54% | -5.01% | -15.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.54% | -0.14% |
Volatility
FWRLX vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) is 5.50%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a volatility of 7.28%. This indicates that FWRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FWRLX | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 7.28% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.36% | 12.68% | -1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.84% | 22.28% | -4.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 21.16% | -3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 20.65% | -2.49% |