FWONK vs. MMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Formula One Group (FWONK) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FWONK or MMC.
Correlation
The correlation between FWONK and MMC is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FWONK vs. MMC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FWONK:
1.93
MMC:
1.29
FWONK:
2.66
MMC:
1.80
FWONK:
1.33
MMC:
1.23
FWONK:
3.00
MMC:
1.71
FWONK:
10.49
MMC:
4.78
FWONK:
4.34%
MMC:
3.79%
FWONK:
23.51%
MMC:
13.97%
FWONK:
-57.74%
MMC:
-67.46%
FWONK:
-4.91%
MMC:
-0.96%
Fundamentals
FWONK:
$24.00B
MMC:
$113.03B
FWONK:
$1.15
MMC:
$8.17
FWONK:
84.50
MMC:
28.17
FWONK:
3.97
MMC:
2.43
FWONK:
$2.45B
MMC:
$24.46B
FWONK:
$667.00M
MMC:
$14.09B
FWONK:
-$2.00B
MMC:
$6.99B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWONK achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly lower than MMC's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FWONK has underperformed MMC with an annualized return of 13.61%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively higher 17.01% annualized return.
FWONK
4.88%
6.56%
21.73%
40.47%
16.59%
13.61%
MMC
8.75%
7.33%
3.44%
16.59%
16.27%
17.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FWONK vs. MMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FWONK
MMC
FWONK vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Formula One Group (FWONK) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FWONK vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison
FWONK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWONK Formula One Group | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.37% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
FWONK vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWONK drawdown since its inception was -57.74%, smaller than the maximum MMC drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWONK and MMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FWONK vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison
Formula One Group (FWONK) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 4.63%. This indicates that FWONK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FWONK vs. MMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Formula One Group and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities