FWONK vs. MMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Formula One Group (FWONK) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FWONK or MMC.
Correlation
The correlation between FWONK and MMC is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FWONK vs. MMC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FWONK:
2.05
MMC:
0.87
FWONK:
2.85
MMC:
1.22
FWONK:
1.36
MMC:
1.16
FWONK:
2.65
MMC:
1.15
FWONK:
11.50
MMC:
3.49
FWONK:
4.29%
MMC:
3.51%
FWONK:
24.00%
MMC:
13.98%
FWONK:
-57.74%
MMC:
-67.46%
FWONK:
-2.93%
MMC:
-8.52%
Fundamentals
FWONK:
$22.83B
MMC:
$103.80B
FWONK:
$1.15
MMC:
$8.12
FWONK:
80.60
MMC:
26.03
FWONK:
3.97
MMC:
2.24
FWONK:
$2.45B
MMC:
$18.39B
FWONK:
$667.00M
MMC:
$8.03B
FWONK:
$606.00M
MMC:
$5.55B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWONK achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than MMC's 0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FWONK has underperformed MMC with an annualized return of 14.25%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.22% annualized return.
FWONK
0.03%
-2.52%
16.46%
45.65%
15.04%
14.25%
MMC
0.45%
-0.79%
-1.80%
10.49%
15.38%
16.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FWONK vs. MMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FWONK
MMC
FWONK vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Formula One Group (FWONK) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FWONK vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison
FWONK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWONK Formula One Group | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.43% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
FWONK vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWONK drawdown since its inception was -57.74%, smaller than the maximum MMC drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWONK and MMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FWONK vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison
Formula One Group (FWONK) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 3.56%. This indicates that FWONK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FWONK vs. MMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Formula One Group and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities