PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FWD vs. CSPX.AS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FWD and CSPX.AS is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

FWD vs. CSPX.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
15.49%
9.64%
FWD
CSPX.AS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FWD:

1.16

CSPX.AS:

2.13

Sortino Ratio

FWD:

1.61

CSPX.AS:

2.94

Omega Ratio

FWD:

1.21

CSPX.AS:

1.42

Calmar Ratio

FWD:

2.01

CSPX.AS:

3.23

Martin Ratio

FWD:

6.67

CSPX.AS:

14.16

Ulcer Index

FWD:

4.00%

CSPX.AS:

1.89%

Daily Std Dev

FWD:

23.00%

CSPX.AS:

12.49%

Max Drawdown

FWD:

-16.22%

CSPX.AS:

-33.65%

Current Drawdown

FWD:

-1.54%

CSPX.AS:

-0.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWD achieves a 8.69% return, which is significantly higher than CSPX.AS's 2.47% return.


FWD

YTD

8.69%

1M

7.31%

6M

15.55%

1Y

26.94%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CSPX.AS

YTD

2.47%

1M

2.97%

6M

16.51%

1Y

27.21%

5Y*

14.55%

10Y*

13.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FWD vs. CSPX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.AS's 0.07% expense ratio.


FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
Expense ratio chart for FWD: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for CSPX.AS: current value at 0.07% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FWD vs. CSPX.AS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FWD is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FWD is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FWD is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FWD is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FWD is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FWD is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CSPX.AS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSPX.AS is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSPX.AS is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSPX.AS is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSPX.AS is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSPX.AS is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSPX.AS is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FWD vs. CSPX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FWD, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.121.75
The chart of Sortino ratio for FWD, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.562.44
The chart of Omega ratio for FWD, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.211.33
The chart of Calmar ratio for FWD, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.882.65
The chart of Martin ratio for FWD, currently valued at 6.25, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.2510.48
FWD
CSPX.AS

The current FWD Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWD and CSPX.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.504.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.12
1.75
FWD
CSPX.AS

Dividends

FWD vs. CSPX.AS - Dividend Comparison

FWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while CSPX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
1.74%1.89%
CSPX.AS
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FWD vs. CSPX.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWD drawdown since its inception was -16.22%, smaller than the maximum CSPX.AS drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWD and CSPX.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.54%
-0.75%
FWD
CSPX.AS

Volatility

FWD vs. CSPX.AS - Volatility Comparison

AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a higher volatility of 9.25% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) at 4.33%. This indicates that FWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.25%
4.33%
FWD
CSPX.AS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab